Periprostatic administration of local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

被引:51
作者
Berger, AP
Frauscher, F
Halpern, EJ
Spranger, R
Steiner, H
Bartsch, G
Horninger, W
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Urol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] Univ Innsbruck, Dept Radiol, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Radiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02406-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To evaluate the effect of periprostatic infiltration with local anesthesia on the level of discomfort associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. Transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate is the standard procedure to diagnose prostate cancer. Methods. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed on 100 men referred for biopsy of the prostate. Fifty subjects were randomized to periprostatic injection of 10 mL of 2% lidocaine solution without epinephrine, and 50 were randomized to injection of placebo (10 mL of 0.9% NaCl). Each subject completed three 10-point visual analog scales for pain after a series of 15 needle biopsies. Pain was rated during the biopsy, diagnostic investigation, and injection of lidocaine. Results. Patients who received local anesthesia had significantly lower visual analog scale scores compared with the group without lidocaine during the biopsy (mean score 0.76 versus 3.62, P < 0.001) and diagnostic examination (mean score 1.08 versus 1.86, P = 0.025). Lidocaine injection caused no adverse effects. Conclusions. Periprostatic injection of lidocaine represents a simple and safe procedure that significantly reduces discomfort during probe manipulation and biopsy. We recommend this procedure in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy. (C) 2003, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 588
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods
    Alavi, AS
    Soloway, MS
    Vaidya, A
    Lynne, CM
    Gheiler, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (04) : 1343 - 1345
  • [2] TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF THE PROSTATE - COMPLICATIONS AND ACCEPTANCE BY PATIENTS
    AUS, G
    HERMANSSON, CG
    HUGOSSON, J
    PEDERSEN, KV
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 71 (04): : 457 - 459
  • [3] Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy: Results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial
    Chang, SS
    Alberts, G
    Wells, N
    Smith, JA
    Cookson, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) : 2178 - 2180
  • [4] Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis
    Chen, ME
    Troncoso, P
    Johnston, DA
    Tang, K
    Babaian, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (06) : 2168 - 2175
  • [5] SIDE-EFFECTS AND PATIENT ACCEPTABILITY OF TRANSRECTAL BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE
    CLEMENTS, R
    AIDEYAN, OU
    GRIFFITHS, GJ
    PEELING, WB
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (02) : 125 - 126
  • [6] MULTIPLE TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PROSTATIC BIOPSIES - TRUE MORBIDITY AND PATIENT ACCEPTANCE
    COLLINS, GN
    LLOYD, SN
    HEHIR, M
    MCKELVIE, GB
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 71 (04): : 460 - 463
  • [7] Desgrandchamps F, 1999, BJU INT, V83, P1007
  • [8] MORBIDITY WITH CONTEMPORARY PROSTATE BIOPSY
    DESMOND, PM
    CLARK, J
    THOMPSON, IM
    ZEIDMAN, EJ
    MUELLER, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (05) : 1425 - 1426
  • [9] Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate
    Eskew, LA
    Bare, RL
    McCullough, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) : 199 - 202
  • [10] Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: Impact on prostate cancer detection
    Frauscher, F
    Klauser, A
    Volgger, H
    Halpern, EJ
    Pallwein, L
    Steiner, H
    Schuster, A
    Horninger, W
    Rogatsch, H
    Bartsch, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04) : 1648 - 1652