Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue

被引:21
作者
Boyko, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Kothari, Anita [3 ]
Wathen, C. Nadine [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Studies, Hlth Sci Bldg,Room 403, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, Hlth Sci Bldg,Room 403, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Hlth Studies, Hlth Sci Bldg,Room 222, London, ON N6A 5B9, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Fac Informat & Media Studies, Hlth Informat Sci, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Knowledge translation; Evidence-informed decision-making; Public health policy; Family violence; Collaborative sensemaking; INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE; CHILD MALTREATMENT; TRANSLATION; EXCHANGE; PERCEPTIONS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-016-0100-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a need to understand scientific evidence in light of the context within which it will be used. Deliberative dialogues are a promising strategy that can be used to meet this evidence interpretation challenge. Methods: We evaluated a deliberative dialogue held by a transnational violence prevention network. The deliberative dialogue included researchers and knowledge user partners of the Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network and was incorporated into a biennial full-team meeting. The dialogue included pre- and post-meeting activities, as well as deliberations embedded within the meeting agenda. The deliberations included a preparatory plenary session, small group sessions and a synthesizing plenary. The challenge addressed through the process was how to mobilize research to orient health and social service systems to prevent family violence and its consequences. The deliberations focused on the challenge, potential solutions for addressing it and implementation factors. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected via questionnaires, meeting minutes, dialogue documents and follow-up telephone interviews. Results: Forty-four individuals (all known to each other and from diverse professional roles, settings and countries) participated in the deliberative dialogue. Ten of the 12 features of the deliberative dialogue were rated favourably by all respondents. The mean behavioural intention score was 5.7 on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), suggesting that many participants intended to use what they learned in their future decision-making. Interviews provided further insight into what might be done to facilitate the use of research in the violence prevention arena. Conclusion: Findings suggest that participants will use dialogue learnings to influence practice and policy change. Deliberative dialogues may be a viable strategy for collaborative sensemaking of research related to family violence prevention, and other public health topics.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, World Report on Violence and Health. [pdf]
[3]   Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes [J].
Baker, Richard ;
Camosso-Stefinovic, Janette ;
Gillies, Clare ;
Shaw, Elizabeth J. ;
Cheater, Francine ;
Flottorp, Signe ;
Robertson, Noelle .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (03)
[4]  
Boyko Jennifer A, 2014, Healthc Policy, V9, P122
[5]   Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making [J].
Boyko, Jennifer A. ;
Lavis, John N. ;
Abelson, Julia ;
Dobbins, Maureen ;
Carter, Nancy .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (11) :1938-1945
[6]   Reliability of a tool for measuring theory of planned behaviour constructs for use in evaluating research use in policymaking [J].
Boyko, Jennifer A. ;
Lavis, John N. ;
Dobbins, Maureen ;
Souza, Nathan M. .
HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2011, 9
[7]  
Bryman A., 2009, QUAL RES, V6, P197
[8]  
Culyer A.J., 2006, Evidence Policy, V2, P357, DOI [DOI 10.1332/174426406778023658, 10.1332/174426406778023658]
[9]   A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies [J].
Dobbins, Maureen ;
Hanna, Steven E. ;
Ciliska, Donna ;
Manske, Steve ;
Cameron, Roy ;
Mercer, Shawna L. ;
O'Mara, Linda ;
DeCorby, Kara ;
Robeson, Paula .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
[10]   Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Wieringa, Sietse .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2011, 104 (12) :501-509