Climate change preparedness across sectors of the built environment-A review of literature

被引:34
作者
Hurlimann, Anna C. [1 ]
Nielsen, Josh [1 ]
Moosavi, Sareh [2 ]
Bush, Judy [1 ]
Warren-Myers, Georgia [1 ]
March, Alan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Fac Architecture Cambre Horta, Pl Eug Ene Flagey 19, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Built environments; Climate change; Professionals; Preparedness; Barriers; Facilitators; AUSTRALIAN CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; CHANGE ADAPTATION; REAL-ESTATE; MAINSTREAMING CLIMATE; DESIGN; BARRIERS; SUSTAINABILITY; CHALLENGES; IMPACTS; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cities (built environments) produce a significant proportion of global greenhouse gas emissions, making a significant contribution to climate change. They are home to the majority of the world's population and economic activity yet face increasing risks from climate change impacts. Thus, it is critical that those involved in producing and managing built environments are prepared for climate change. This paper presents a review of literature focused on two key components of professions and professional practice across the built environment sectors urban planning, construction, property, and design (architecture, landscape architecture, urban design): 1) barriers to and facilitators of climate change action (mitigation and adaptation); and 2) climate change preparedness. Barriers to and facilitators of climate change action were found to vary across sectors, with some overlap. A limited understanding of preparedness to address climate change action was found across the sectors reviewed. These findings are important. A limited understanding of climate change preparedness across these sectors may limit capacity to achieve global goals such as the Paris Agreement which seeks to limit global warming to 1.5 oC, and to be well adapted to the changes that will occur. Significant social and economic impacts could result from a lack of preparedness. The published research reviewed lacked a holistic and integrated view of: the built environment; and of climate change action within it. It is recommended that these gaps in research and practice are addressed to facilitate effective climate change action in cities, to avoid further economic, social and environmental impacts of climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 289
页数:13
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]   Windows of opportunity: addressing climate uncertainty through adaptation plan implementation [J].
Abunnasr, Yaser ;
Hamin, Elisabeth M. ;
Brabec, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 58 (01) :135-155
[2]   Building a global urban science [J].
Acuto, Michele ;
Parnell, Susan ;
Seto, Karen C. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (01) :2-4
[3]  
AILA, 2019, AILA DECL CLIM BIOD
[4]  
Allen M., 2018, Global Warming of 1.5C an IPCC Special Report
[5]   The Problematizing Review: A Counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg's Argument for Integrative Reviews [J].
Alvesson, Mats ;
Sandberg, Jorgen .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2020, 57 (06) :1290-1304
[6]  
Anderson S., 2019, REAL ESTATE SECTOR I, V3
[7]   A review of climate change implications for built environment: Impacts, mitigation measures and associated challenges in developed and developing countries [J].
Andric, Ivan ;
Koc, Muammer ;
Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 :83-102
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Global report on human settlements: Cities and climate change
[9]  
ASLA, 2017, DEF RES DES
[10]   Local government response to the impacts of climate change: An evaluation of local climate adaptation plans [J].
Baker, Ingrid ;
Peterson, Ann ;
Brown, Greg ;
McAlpine, Clive .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (02) :127-136