Qualitative comparative analysis: Configurational paths to innovation performance

被引:33
作者
Zheng, Lu [1 ]
Ulrich, Klaus [2 ]
Sendra-Garcia, Javier [3 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] ESIC Business & Mkt Sch, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Knowledge management; Innovation performance; Business environment; Government support; Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; fsQCA; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; POTENTIAL ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SEARCH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MODERATING ROLE; MARKET ORIENTATION; RADICAL INNOVATION; ORGANIZATIONAL ANTECEDENTS; TECHNOLOGICAL OPPORTUNITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.044
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although innovation research has received considerable attention in recent decades, the main focus has been on net effects analysis derived from symmetric thinking. Few studies have taken a holistic approach by investigating causal combinations of antecedent conditions. In addressing the question of how to promote firms' innovation performance, we propose six antecedents from the internal, interfirm, and external contexts. These antecedents are knowledge stock, absorptive capacity, knowledge depth, knowledge breadth, government support, and the business environment. We apply fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to identify alternative configurations leading to high innovation performance from the perspective of knowledge management and innovation ecosystems. Data from 253 listed Chinese manufacturing firms form the basis of the analysis. The findings reveal seven configurational paths that explain high innovation performance and three paths to the absence of high innovation performance. This study provides new insight for innovation research. The paper concludes by discussing the implications for managers and policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 93
页数:11
相关论文
共 174 条
[1]   Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey [J].
Amara, N ;
Landry, R .
TECHNOVATION, 2005, 25 (03) :245-259
[2]  
Amidon D.M., 1997, INNOVATION STRATEGY, DOI 10.4324/9780080491561
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, J BUS RES, V128, P83
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, CONTINGENCY THEORY O
[5]   Coopetition in innovation ecosystems: A comparative analysis of knowledge transfer configurations [J].
Bacon, Emily ;
Williams, Michael D. ;
Davies, Gareth .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 115 :307-316
[6]   The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? [J].
Barney, Jay B. ;
Ketchen, David J., Jr. ;
Wright, Mike .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 37 (05) :1299-1315
[7]   Resource-based theories of competitive advantage:: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view [J].
Barney, JB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :643-650
[9]   Joint forces: Towards an integration of intellectual capital theory and the open innovation paradigm [J].
Barrena-Martinez, Jesus ;
Cricelli, Livio ;
Ferrandiz, Esther ;
Greco, Marco ;
Grimaldi, Michele .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 112 :261-270
[10]  
Bergner D, 2009, CH CRC DATA MIN KNOW, P19