Comparison of two within-household selection methods in a telephone survey of substance abuse and dependence

被引:9
作者
Beebe, Timothy J.
Davern, Michael E.
McAlpine, Donna D.
Ziegenfuss, Jeanette K.
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Coll Med, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Management & Policy, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
data collection; epidemiologic methods; interviews; random-digit dialing; sampling studies;
D O I
10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.01.031
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: Random-digit dial telephone surveys often rely on the random selection of one respondent within the household. We compared a new method of within-household selection to a standard "next birthday" approach on selected survey process measures, respondent characteristics, and substantive results. Methods: From October 2004 through June 2005, we conducted a survey of adults in Minnesota to obtain information about substance use and need for treatment. Control group respondents (n = 1944) were selected using the "next birthday" method, and experimental group respondents (n = 1086) were selected using a new method developed by Rizzo, Brick, and Park. We assessed group differences for survey process measures, such as the number of attempts to interview and the refusal, response, and cooperation rates. We also examined whether the groups differed in demographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Results: The experimental group had higher rates of refusal and lower response and cooperation rates. Demographic factors and most measures of substance use and mental health did not differ significantly between groups. Conclusions: The experimental method of within-household selection developed by Rizzo and colleagues does not offer advantages over the classic "next birthday" method. Study limitations are discussed and opportunities for future research are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
  • [2] Binson D., 2000, J. Off. Stat., V16, P53
  • [3] Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century
    Curtin, R
    Presser, S
    Singer, E
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [4] Comparative analysis of within-household respondent selection techniques
    Gaziano, C
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (01) : 124 - 157
  • [5] Screening for serious mental illness in the general population
    Kessler, RC
    Barker, PR
    Colpe, LJ
    Epstein, JF
    Gfroerer, JC
    Hiripi, E
    Howes, MJ
    Normand, SLT
    Manderscheid, RW
    Walters, EE
    Zaslavsky, AM
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 60 (02) : 184 - 189
  • [7] The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 - Validity of a two-item depression screener
    Kroenke, K
    Spitzer, RL
    Williams, JBW
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2003, 41 (11) : 1284 - 1292
  • [8] LAVRAKAS PJ, IN PRESS SAGE PUBLIC
  • [9] LIND K, 2000, ANN M AM ASS PUBL OP
  • [10] LONSTRETH M, 2005, 60 ANN M AM ASS PUBL