Comparison of Excimer Laser Versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Trephination in Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study

被引:18
|
作者
Toth, Gabor [1 ,2 ]
Szentmary, Nora [1 ,2 ]
Langenbucher, Achim [3 ]
Akhmedova, Elina [1 ]
El-Husseiny, Moatasem [1 ]
Seitz, Berthold [1 ]
机构
[1] Saarland Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Kirrberger Str 100, D-66424 Homburg, Germany
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Maria Utca 39, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Saarland Univ, Expt Ophthalmol, Kirrberger Str 100, D-66424 Homburg, Germany
关键词
Astigmatism; Excimer; Femtosecond; Laser; Ophthalmology; Penetrating keratoplasty; Visual acuity; SUTURE REMOVAL; ASTIGMATISM;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-019-01120-3
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction To compare the impact of non-mechanical excimer-assisted (EXCIMER) and femtosecond laser-assisted (FEMTO) trephination on outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Methods In this retrospective study, 68 eyes from 23 females and 45 males (mean age at time of surgery, 53.3 +/- 19.8 years) were included. Inclusion criteria were one surgeon (BS), primary central PK, Fuchs' dystrophy (FUCHS) or keratoconus (KC), no previous intraocular surgery, graft oversize 0.1 mm and 16-bite double running suture. Trephination was performed using a manually guided 193-nm Zeiss Meditec MEL70 excimer laser (EXCIMER group: 18 FUCHS, 17 KC) or 60-kHz IntraLase (TM) femtosecond laser (FEMTO group: 16 FUCHS, 17 KC). Subjective refractometry (trial glasses) and corneal topography analysis (Pentacam HR; Casia SS-1000 AS-OCT; TMS-5) were performed preoperatively, before removal of the first suture (11.4 +/- 1.9 months) and after removal of the second suture (22.6 +/- 3.8 months). Results Before suture removal, mean refractive/AS-OCT topographic astigmatism did not differ significantly between EXCIMER and FEMTO. After suture removal, mean refractive/Pentacam/AS-OCT topographic astigmatism was significantly higher in the FEMTO (6.2 +/- 2.9 D/7.1 +/- 3.2 D/7.4 +/- 3.3 D) than in the EXCIMER patients (4.3 +/- 3.0 D/4.4 +/- 3.1 D/4.0 +/- 2.9 D) (p <= 0.005). Mean corrected distance visual acuity increased from 0.22 and 0.23 preoperatively to 0.55 and 0.53 before or 0.7 and 0.6 after suture removal in the EXCIMER and FEMTO groups, respectively. Differences between EXCIMER and FEMTO were only pronounced in the KC subgroup. Conclusion Non-mechanical EXCIMER trephination seems to have advantages regarding postoperative corneal astigmatism and visual acuity compared with FEMTO trephination, especially in KC. A bigger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of EXCIMER and FEMTO trephination on postoperative topographic and visual outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:3471 / 3482
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Excimer Laser Versus Femtosecond Laser Assisted Trephination in Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Retrospective Study
    Gábor Tóth
    Nóra Szentmáry
    Achim Langenbucher
    Elina Akhmedova
    Moatasem El-Husseiny
    Berthold Seitz
    Advances in Therapy, 2019, 36 : 3471 - 3482
  • [2] Comparison of Femtosecond Laser-assisted Keratoplasty versus Conventional Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Chamberlain, Winston D.
    Rush, Sloan W.
    Mathers, William D.
    Cabezas, Mauricio
    Fraunfelder, Frederick W.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (03) : 486 - 491
  • [3] Femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasty
    Birnbaum, F.
    Maier, P.
    Reinhard, T.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2010, 107 (02): : 186 - 188
  • [4] Donor decentration of mechanical and excimer laser trephination for penetrating keratoplasty
    Seitz, B
    Langenbucher, A
    Meiller, R
    Kus, MM
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2000, 217 (03) : 144 - 151
  • [5] 193 NM EXCIMER-LASER TREPHINATION IN PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY
    NAUMANN, GOH
    SEITZ, B
    LANG, GK
    LANGENBUCHER, A
    KUS, MM
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1993, 203 (04) : 252 - 261
  • [6] Vertical tilt after penetrating keratoplasty - Comparison between nonmechanical trephination with the excimer laser and motor trephination
    Langenbucher, A
    Seitz, B
    Kus, MM
    Naumann, GOH
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1998, 212 (03) : 129 - 140
  • [7] Comparison of the Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty Using a Manual Trephine and Femtosecond-Laser Trephination
    So, Ha-Rim
    Kim, Seon-Joo
    Joo, Choun-Ki
    Hwang, You-Sook
    Byun, Yong-Soo
    Chung, So-Hyang
    Kim, Hyun-Seung
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (12): : 1424 - 1432
  • [8] Comparison between manual trephination versus femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for keratoconus
    Salouti, Ramin
    Zamani, Mohammad
    Ghoreyshi, Maryam
    Dapena, Isabel
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    Nowroozzadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 103 (12) : 1716 - 1723
  • [9] Regularity of corneal topography after penetrating keratoplasty - Nonmechanical trephination with the excimer laser 193 nm vs mechanical trephination
    Langenbucher, A
    Seitz, B
    Kus, MM
    Vilchis, E
    Naumann, GOH
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 1996, 208 (06) : 450 - 458
  • [10] Outcome of "Mushroom" Pattern Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients With Keratoconus
    Levinger, Eliya
    Trivizki, Omer
    Levinger, Shmuel
    Kremer, Israel
    CORNEA, 2014, 33 (05) : 481 - 485