Vaccination and non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a mathematical modelling study

被引:377
作者
Moore, Sam [1 ,2 ]
Hill, Edward M. [1 ,2 ]
Tildesley, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Dyson, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Keeling, Matt J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Zeeman Inst Syst Biol & Infect Dis Epidemiol Res, Math Inst, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Sch Life Sci, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00143-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background The dynamics of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 are complicated by age-dependent factors, changing levels of infection, and the relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) as the perceived risk declines, necessitating the use of mathematical models. Our aims were to use epidemiological data from the UK together with estimates of vaccine efficacy to predict the possible long-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 under the planned vaccine rollout. Methods In this study, we used a mathematical model structured by age and UK region, fitted to a range of epidemiological data in the UK, which incorporated the planned rollout of a two-dose vaccination programme (doses 12 weeks apart, protection onset 14 days after vaccination). We assumed default vaccine uptake of 95% in those aged 80 years and older, 85% in those aged 50-79 years, and 75% in those aged 18-49 years, and then varied uptake optimistically and pessimistically. Vaccine efficacy against symptomatic disease was assumed to be 88% on the basis of Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines being administered in the UK, and protection against infection was varied from 0% to 85%. We considered the combined interaction of the UK vaccination programme with multiple potential future relaxations (or removals) of NPIs, to predict the reproduction number (R) and pattern of daily deaths and hospital admissions due to COVID-19 from January, 2021, to January, 2024. Findings We estimate that vaccination alone is insufficient to contain the outbreak. In the absence of NPIs, even with our most optimistic assumption that the vaccine will prevent 85% of infections, we estimate R to be 1.58 (95% credible intervals [CI] 1.36-1.84) once all eligible adults have been offered both doses of the vaccine. Under the default uptake scenario, removal of all NPIs once the vaccination programme is complete is predicted to lead to 21 400 deaths (95% CI 1400-55 100) due to COVID-19 for a vaccine that prevents 85% of infections, although this number increases to 96 700 deaths (51 800-173 200) if the vaccine only prevents 60% of infections. Although vaccination substantially reduces total deaths, it only provides partial protection for the individual; we estimate that, for the default uptake scenario and 60% protection against infection, 48.3% (95% CI 48.1-48.5) and 16.0% (15.7-16.3) of deaths will be in individuals who have received one or two doses of the vaccine, respectively. Interpretation For all vaccination scenarios we investigated, our predictions highlight the risks associated with early or rapid relaxation of NPIs. Although novel vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 offer a potential exit strategy for the pandemic, success is highly contingent on the precise vaccine properties and population uptake, both of which need to be carefully monitored. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 802
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, COVID-19: The Green Book, Chapter 14a. Immunisation Against Infectious Diseases
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, COVID 19 WEEKL ANN V
  • [3] Bachtiger P, 2020, MEDRXIV, DOI [10.1101/2020.12.07.20243881, DOI 10.1101/2020.12.07.20243881]
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
    Baden, Lindsey R.
    El Sahly, Hana M.
    Essink, Brandon
    Kotloff, Karen
    Frey, Sharon
    Novak, Rick
    Diemert, David
    Spector, Stephen A.
    Rouphael, Nadine
    Creech, C. Buddy
    McGettigan, John
    Khetan, Shishir
    Segall, Nathan
    Solis, Joel
    Brosz, Adam
    Fierro, Carlos
    Schwartz, Howard
    Neuzil, Kathleen
    Corey, Larry
    Gilbert, Peter
    Janes, Holly
    Follmann, Dean
    Marovich, Mary
    Mascola, John
    Polakowski, Laura
    Ledgerwood, Julie
    Graham, Barney S.
    Bennett, Hamilton
    Pajon, Rolando
    Knightly, Conor
    Leav, Brett
    Deng, Weiping
    Zhou, Honghong
    Han, Shu
    Ivarsson, Melanie
    Miller, Jacqueline
    Zaks, Tal
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (05) : 403 - 416
  • [5] Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature
    Biggerstaff, Matthew
    Cauchemez, Simon
    Reed, Carrie
    Gambhir, Manoj
    Finelli, Lyn
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 14
  • [6] Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: A systematic review
    Bish, Alison
    Yardley, Lucy
    Nicoll, Angus
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. VACCINE, 2011, 29 (38) : 6472 - 6484
  • [7] Bonsall M, 2021, MEDRXIV
  • [8] GUINEAWORM CONTROL CASE-STUDY - PLANNING A MULTI-STRATEGY APPROACH
    BRIEGER, WR
    RAMAKRISHNA, J
    ADENIYI, JD
    SRIDHAR, MKC
    KALE, OO
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1991, 32 (12) : 1319 - 1326
  • [9] Model-informed COVID-19 vaccine prioritization strategies by age and serostatus
    Bubar, Kate M.
    Reinholt, Kyle
    Kissler, Stephen M.
    Lipsitch, Marc
    Cobey, Sarah
    Grad, Yonatan H.
    Larremore, Daniel B.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 371 (6532) : 916 - +
  • [10] The challenges of containing SARS-CoV-2 via test-trace-and-isolate
    Contreras, Sebastian
    Dehning, Jonas
    Loidolt, Matthias
    Zierenberg, Johannes
    Spitzner, F. Paul
    Urrea-Quintero, Jorge H.
    Mohr, Sebastian B.
    Wilczek, Michael
    Wibral, Michael
    Priesemann, Viola
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)