The Strategic Role of Exchange Promotions

被引:45
作者
Desai, Preyas S. [1 ]
Purohit, Devavrat [1 ]
Zhou, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
behavioral economics; durable goods; emerging markets; marketing strategy; waste aversion; promotion; price discrimination; trade-in; segmentation; TRADE-INS; PSYCHOLOGY; LESS;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.2015.0955
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An exchange promotion allows consumers to turn in an old good and receive a discount toward the purchase of a new product. The old good that is turned in can either be within the same category as the new good or it may be in a different category. For example, one can turn in an old CD player to count toward a new CD player (a within-category exchange or traditional trade-in) or toward a new television (a cross-category exchange). This paper studies both within-category and multicategory exchange promotions and analyzes their similarities and differences. In a competitive setting with two firms, we model exchange promotions and establish the equilibrium outcomes. We find that categories in which consumers have a high level of waste aversion are more likely to have multicategory exchange promotions rather than within-category or no promotions. Multicategory exchange promotions can increase both consumers' replacement purchases and their new purchases. Interestingly, we also find that strategic considerations can lead to a prisoner's dilemma outcome in which neither firm offers any kind of exchange promotion. However, waste aversion and multicategory exchange promotions can give firms stronger incentives to get out of the prisoner's dilemma outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 112
页数:20
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[2]  
Arkes HR, 1996, J BEHAV DECIS MAKING, V9, P213, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199609)9:3<213::AID-BDM230>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-1
[4]   When less is more: Consumer aversion to unused utility [J].
Bolton, Lisa E. ;
Alba, Joseph W. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) :369-383
[5]   Let me talk to my manager: Haggling in a competitive environment [J].
Desai, PS ;
Purohit, D .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2004, 23 (02) :219-233
[6]   Keeping it all without being buried alive: Understanding product retention tendency [J].
Haws, Kelly L. ;
Naylor, Rebecca Walker ;
Coulter, Robin A. ;
Bearden, William O. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) :224-236
[7]   STABILITY IN COMPETITION [J].
Hotelling, Harold .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1929, 39 (153) :41-57
[8]   More or Less: A Model and Empirical Evidence on Preferences for Under- and Overpayment in Trade-In Transactions [J].
Kim, Jungkeun ;
Rao, Raghunath Singh ;
Kim, Kyeongheui ;
Rao, Akshay R. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (01) :157-171
[9]   DOUBLE COUPONING AND RETAIL PRICING IN A COUPONED PRODUCT CATEGORY [J].
KRISHNAN, TV ;
RAO, RC .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :419-432
[10]   Supermarket competition: The case of every day low pricing [J].
Lal, R ;
Rao, R .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1997, 16 (01) :60-80