Establishing cutoff scores on assessments of surgical skills to determine surgical competence

被引:48
作者
Jelovsek, J. Eric [1 ]
Walters, Mark D.
Korn, Abner [2 ]
Klingele, Christopher [3 ]
Zite, Nikki
Ridgeway, Beri
Barber, Matthew D.
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
assessment; competence; global assessment of operative performance; vaginal hysterectomy; vaginal surgery; vaginal surgical skills index; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.073
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish minimum cutoff scores on intraoperative assessments of surgical skills to determine surgical competence for vaginal hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Two surgical rating scales, the Global Rating Scale of Operative Performance and the Vaginal Surgical Skills Index, were used to evaluate trainees while performing vaginal hysterectomy. Cutoff scores were determined using the Modified Angoff method. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve evaluations were analyzed on 76 surgeries performed by 27 trainees. Trainees were considered minimally competent to perform vaginal hysterectomy if total absolute scores (95% confidence interval) on Global Rating Scale = 18 (16.5-20.3) and Vaginal Surgical Skills Index = 32 (27.7-35.5). On average, trainees met new cutoffs after performing 21 and 27 vaginal hysterectomies, respectively. With the new cutoffs applied to the same cohort of fourth-year obstetrics and gynecology trainees, all residents achieved competency in performing vaginal hysterectomy by the end of their gynecology rotations. CONCLUSION: Standard-setting methods using cutoff scores may be used to establish competence in vaginal surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:81.e1 / 81.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2005, Obstet Gynecol, V105, P929
[2]  
Angoff W.H., 1971, ED MEASUREMENT, V2nd, P508
[3]  
BIENSTOCK JL, 2009, ED OBJECTIVES CORE C
[4]   A Modified Contrasting Groups Method Used for Setting the Passmark in a Small Scale Standardised Patient Examination [J].
Burrows, Peter J. ;
Bingham, Liz ;
Brailovsky, Carlos A. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1999, 4 (02) :145-154
[5]  
CHEN C, 2010, AM J OBSTET IN PRESS
[6]  
CISEK GJ, 1996, ED MEASUREMENT ISSUE, V15, P12
[7]   A CONTRASTING-GROUPS APPROACH TO STANDARD-SETTING FOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS OF CLINICAL SKILLS [J].
CLAUSER, BE ;
CLYMAN, SG .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1994, 69 (10) :S42-S44
[8]   Standard setting in medical education [J].
Cusimano, MD .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1996, 71 (10) :S112-S120
[9]  
DEGRUIJTER DNM, 1985, J EDUC MEAS, V22, P263
[10]   Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education [J].
Downing, SM ;
Tekian, A ;
Yudkowsky, R .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2006, 18 (01) :50-57