Preexisting knowledge versus on-line learning - What do young infants really know about spatial location?

被引:28
作者
Newcombe, NS
Sluzenski, J
Huttenlocher, J
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00807.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Contemporary knowledge of infant cognition relies heavily on violation-of-expectation experiments. However, there are two ways to conceptualize what occurs in such studies. Babies may react to anomalous test events because of preexisting world knowledge. Alternatively, they may react because they have learned about events during the familiarization period. One way to distinguish these possibilities is to contrast familiarization with everyday versus anomalous events. In the studies we report here, we used this method to probe the nature of 5-month-olds' expectations about the locations of objects hidden in sand and later revealed. In Experiment 1, infants who initially saw everyday events did react to anomalous ones, as found previously, whereas infants who initially saw anomalous events did not react to everyday events. In Experiment 2, two alternative explanations of this pattern were ruled out. We conclude that by the age of 5 months, infants have expectations regarding the location of objects in continuous space.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 227
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Baillargeon R., 2002, Blackwell Handb. Child. Cognit. Dev., P47, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9780470996652.CH3, 10.1002/9780470996652.ch3]
[2]   Examining individual differences in infants' habituation patterns using objective quantitative techniques [J].
Gilmore, RO ;
Thomas, H .
INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 25 (04) :399-412
[3]  
Haith M. M., 1998, Handbook of Child Psychology. Volume two-Cognition, Perception, V2, P199
[4]   Development of object concepts in infancy: Evidence for early learning in an eye-tracking paradigm [J].
Johnson, SP ;
Amso, D ;
Slemmer, JA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (18) :10568-10573
[5]   DO 6-MONTH-OLD INFANTS PERCEIVE CAUSALITY [J].
LESLIE, AM ;
KEEBLE, S .
COGNITION, 1987, 25 (03) :265-288
[6]   SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STRUCTURE OF SPATIAL MEMORY [J].
MCNAMARA, TP ;
HALPIN, JA ;
HARDY, JK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1992, 18 (03) :555-564
[7]   INTUITIONS ABOUT SUPPORT IN 4.5-MONTH-OLD INFANTS [J].
NEEDHAM, A ;
BAILLARGEON, R .
COGNITION, 1993, 47 (02) :121-148
[8]   Infants' coding of location in continuous space [J].
Newcombe, N ;
Huttenlocher, J ;
Learmonth, A .
INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 22 (04) :483-510
[9]   That's the way the ball bounces: infants' and adults' perception of spatial and temporal contiguity in collisions involving bouncing balls [J].
Oakes, Lisa M. ;
Kannass, Kathleen N. .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 1999, 2 (01) :86-101
[10]   The future of infant categorization research: A process-oriented approach [J].
Oakes, LM ;
Madole, KL .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 71 (01) :119-126