Technological barriers and incentives to learning analytics adoption in higher education: insights from users

被引:44
作者
Klein, Carrie [1 ]
Lester, Jaime [1 ]
Rangwala, Huzefa [2 ]
Johri, Aditya [3 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Higher Educ Program, 4400 Univ Dr,MSN 1B3, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Comp Sci, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] George Mason Univ, Informat Sci & Technol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Learning analytics; Predictive analytics; Technology adoption; Technological barriers; Technological incentives; Higher education; ACCEPTANCE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1007/s12528-019-09210-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Learning analytics (LA) tools promise to improve student learning and retention. However, adoption and use of LA tools in higher education is often uneven. In this case study, part of a larger exploratory research project, we interviewed and observed 32 faculty and advisors at a public research university to understand the technological incentives and barriers related to LA tool adoption and use. Findings indicate that lack of a trustworthy technological infrastructure, misalignment between LA tool capabilities and user needs, and the existence of ethical concerns about the data, visualizations, and algorithms that underlie LA tools created barriers to adoption. Improving tool integration, clarity, and accuracy, soliciting the technological needs and perspectives of LA tool users, and providing data context may encourage inclusion of these tools into teaching and advising practice.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 625
页数:22
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   From prediction to impact: Evaluation of a learning analytics retention program [J].
Dawson, Shane ;
Jovanovic, Jelena ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Pardo, Abelardo .
SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE (LAK'17), 2017, :474-478
[22]  
Hagen P.L., 2008, Academic advising: A comprehensive handbook, V2nd, P17
[23]  
Klein C, 2019, REV HIGH EDUC, V42, P565
[24]  
Knight DB., 2016, J LEARN ANAL, V3, P215, DOI [DOI 10.18608/JLA.2016.33.11, 10.18608/jla.2016.33]
[25]  
Lester J., 2017, ASHE Higher Education Report, V43, P1, DOI DOI 10.1002/AEHE.20121
[26]  
Lincoln Y.S., 2000, CASE STUDY METHOD, P27, DOI DOI 10.4135/9780857024367
[27]   Informing Pedagogical Action: Aligning Learning Analytics With Learning Design [J].
Lockyer, Lori ;
Heathcote, Elizabeth ;
Dawson, Shane .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2013, 57 (10) :1439-1459
[28]  
Mertens D.M., 2010, Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods, V3rd
[29]   Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge [J].
Mishra, Punya ;
Koehler, Matthew J. .
TEACHERS COLLEGE RECORD, 2006, 108 (06) :1017-1054
[30]  
Moser F.Z., 2007, EDUCAUSE Q, V30, P66