Environmental and Economic Life-Cycle Assessments of Household Food Waste Management Systems: A Comparative Review of Methodology and Research Progress

被引:18
|
作者
Yang, Na [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fangling [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Tao [1 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ]
Zhang, Jiebao [3 ]
Dai, Zhiguang [1 ]
Yu, Boping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Acad Environm Sci, 50 Honggui Rd, Shenzhen 518001, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Environm Protect Sewage High Qual Utili, Shenzhen 518001, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Municipal Solid Waste Sorting Management, Shenzhen 518001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
waste classification; source sorting; life-cycle costing; life-cycle assessment; inventory; anaerobic digestion; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; ORGANIC FRACTION; PERSPECTIVE; OPTIONS; IMPACT; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/su14137533
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Household food waste (HFW) is the main component of municipal solid waste (MSW). Appropriate HFW management strategies could reduce the environmental burdens and economic costs to society. Life-cycle thinking is an effective decision-making tool for MSW management. This paper compares the three main environmental and economic assessment methodologies, i.e., societal life-cycle costing (societal LCC), environmental cost-effectiveness (ECE) analysis, and multicriteria analysis (MCA) in terms of the definitions, method frameworks, and their advantages/disadvantages. Most reviewed studies applied the environmental life-cycle costing (ELCC) method, a simplified ECE, which does not involve interactive quantitative comparisons between environmental and economic benefits. Further attention should be paid to the coordination between life-cycle assessment (LCA) and life-cycle costing (LCC), the monetization coefficient in external cost calculation of societal LCC, and the standardization and evaluation approaches of ECE. HFW prevention is rarely considered in the reviewed literature but was demonstrated as the best route over treatment or utilization. Anaerobic digestion is environmentally preferable to composting and landfilling; it is comparable to biodiesel production, feeding conversation, and incineration. From the perspective of economic costs (including societal LCC), the ranking of treatment technologies varied a lot from one study to another, attributable to the diverse evaluation methods and different data sources. To improve the environmental and economic assessment approaches to HFW management, an inventory database (e.g., food waste properties, technical treatment parameters, material flow, and fund flow data) suitable for HFW should be constructed. When establishing the system boundaries, the processes of source sorting, collection and transportation, and by-product handling should be coherent with the investigated treatment technology.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated economic and environmental assessments through Activity-Based Life-Cycle Assessments
    Emblemsvåg, J
    Bras, B
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1999 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, ISEE - 1999, 1999, : 110 - 115
  • [2] Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of medical waste treatment
    Hong, Jingmin
    Zhan, Song
    Yu, Zhaohe
    Hong, Jinglan
    Qi, Congcong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 : 65 - 73
  • [3] Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan
    Environmental Preservation Research Center, Kyoto University, Yoshida-honmachi, Sakyo-ku Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
    Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 6 (743-752):
  • [4] Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan
    Takeshi Matsuda
    Junya Yano
    Yasuhiro Hirai
    Shin-ichi Sakai
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 743 - 752
  • [5] Life-cycle greenhouse gas inventory analysis of household waste management and food waste reduction activities in Kyoto, Japan
    Matsuda, Takeshi
    Yano, Junya
    Hirai, Yasuhiro
    Sakai, Shin-ichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (06): : 743 - 752
  • [6] Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management - an analytical review
    Saraiva Schott, Anna Bernstad
    Wenzel, Henrik
    Jansen, Jes la Cour
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 119 : 13 - 24
  • [7] What life-cycle assessment does and does not do in assessments of waste management
    Ekvall, Tomas
    Assefa, Getachew
    Bjorklund, Anna
    Eriksson, Ola
    Finnveden, Goran
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 27 (08) : 989 - 996
  • [8] Social Life-Cycle Assessment of Household Waste Management System in Kabul City
    Azimi, Ahmad Nadim
    Dente, Sebastien M. R.
    Hashimoto, Seiji
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [9] Life-cycle assessments of solar water-heating systems: a review
    Wei, Lili
    Guo, Xiujuan
    Zhang, Lina
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENERGY, 2021, 174 (03) : 103 - 112
  • [10] Review of life-cycle environmental consequences of waste-to-energy solutions on the municipal solid waste management system
    Istrate, Ioan-Robert
    Iribarren, Diego
    Galvez-Martos, Jose-Luis
    Dufour, Javier
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 157