Comparative analysis of TCP congestion control mechanisms

被引:1
作者
Bazi, Kaoutar [1 ]
Nassereddine, Bouchaib [1 ]
机构
[1] Hassan 1st Univ, Appl Math & Comp Sci Lab, FST, Settat, Morocco
来源
3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORKING, INFORMATION SYSTEM & SECURITY (NISS'20) | 2020年
关键词
Key Mesh; IEEE; 802.11s; tcp; congestion control; ns2; Tahoe; Reno; New Reno; Vegas; FACK and SACK; WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1145/3386723.3387832
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) is the most used transport protocol for wired and wireless networks. It provides many services (reliability, end to end delivery.) to the applications running over the Internet, but to be able to manage traffics with a huge quantity of data, TCP must have robust congestion control mechanisms. Many researchers have agreed that despite the existence of some congestion control algorithms, TCP still suffers from disappointing performances for short and long flows. For that, researches are still launched by the network community in order to have the suitable mechanism ensuring fair and efficient bandwidth allocation. The works already carried out in this subject has elaborated several congestion control mechanisms. In this paper, we discuss, identify, analyze and compare the behavior of some congestion control mechanisms under congested wireless mech networks, in order to identify their advantages and their respective limits. For the simulation, we used the well known network simulator ns2. Simulation results show that TCP Tahoe, TCP Reno, TCP New Reno, Sack are loss-based, they are beneficial for latency-sensitive flows, while TCP Vegas which is delay- based, it is recommended for applications that don't endure the loss of information but suffers from fairness problems when sharing a bottleneck with competitive flows.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Wireless mesh networks: a survey [J].
Akyildiz, IF ;
Wang, XD ;
Wang, WL .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2005, 47 (04) :445-487
[2]   TCP VEGAS - END-TO-END CONGESTION AVOIDANCE ON A GLOBAL INTERNET [J].
BRAKMO, LS ;
PETERSON, LL .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 13 (08) :1465-1480
[3]   The IEEE 802.11s Extended Service Set mesh networking standard [J].
Camp, Joseph D. ;
Knightly, Edward W. .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2008, 46 (08) :120-126
[4]  
Floyd S., 1999, RFC2582 -the NewReno modification to TCP's fast recovery algorithm
[5]  
Floyd Sally, 2004, RFC3782: The NewReno modification to TCP's fast recovery algorithm
[6]  
HIERTZ GR, 2007, P 16 INT C COMP COMM
[7]  
KHAN Fahad., A Comparative Analysis of TCP Tahoe, Reno, NewReno, SACK and Vegas
[8]  
Mathis M., 1996, ACM SIGCOMM COMP COM, V26, P281
[9]  
Mathis M., 1996, RFC2018 TCP SELECTIV
[10]   Analytic models for the latency and steady-state throughput of TCP Tahoe, Reno, and SACK [J].
Sikdar, B ;
Kalyanaraman, S ;
Vastola, KS .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2003, 11 (06) :959-971