Comparative sustainability study of energy storage technologies using data envelopment analysis

被引:23
作者
Rostami, Fatemeh [1 ]
Kis, Zoltan [2 ,3 ]
Koppelaar, Rembrandt [4 ]
Jimenez, Laureano [1 ]
Pozo, Carlos [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rovira i Virgili, Dept Engn Quim, Ave Paisos Catalans 26, Tarragona 43007, Spain
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, Dept Chem Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Mappin St, Sheffield S1 3JD, England
[4] Ekodenge Ltd, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, England
[5] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Chem Engn, EEBE, Ave Eduard Maristany 16, Barcelona 08019, Spain
关键词
Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Energy storage; Hydrogen; Power systems flexibility; Sustainable energy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LITHIUM-ION BATTERIES; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; REDOX FLOW BATTERY; AMMONIA FUEL-CELL; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ensm.2022.03.026
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The transition to energy systems with a high share of renewable energy depends on the availability of technologies that can connect the physical distances or bridge the time differences between the energy supply and demand points. This study focuses on energy storage technologies due to their expected role in liberating the energy sector from fossil fuels and facilitating the penetration of intermittent renewable sources. The performance of 27 energy storage alternatives is compared considering sustainability aspects by means of data envelopment analysis. To this end, storage alternatives are first classified into two clusters: fast-response and long-term. The levelized cost of energy, energy and water consumption, global warming potential, and employment are common indicators considered for both clusters, while energy density is used only for fast-response technologies, where it plays a key role in technology selection. Flywheel reveals the highest efficiency between all the fast-response technologies, while green ammonia powered with solar energy ranks first for long-term energy storage. An uncertainty analysis is incorporated to discuss the reliability of the results. Overall, results obtained, and guidelines provided can be helpful for both decision-making and research and development purposes. For the former, we identify the most appealing energy storage options to be promoted, while for the latter, we report quantitative improvement targets that would make inefficient technologies competitive if attained. This contribution paves the way for more comprehensive studies in the context of energy storage by presenting a powerful framework for comparing options according to multiple sustainability indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 438
页数:27
相关论文
共 122 条
  • [1] Low-temperature direct ammonia fuel cells: Recent developments and remaining challenges
    Abbasi, Reza
    Setzler, Brian P.
    Wang, Junhua
    Zhao, Yun
    Wang, Teng
    Gottesfeld, Shimshon
    Yan, Yushan
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ELECTROCHEMISTRY, 2020, 21 : 335 - 344
  • [2] Design and environmental sustainability assessment of small-scale off-grid energy systems for remote rural communities
    Aberilla, Jhud Mikhail
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    Stamford, Laurence
    Azapagic, Adisa
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 258
  • [3] Review and evaluation of hydrogen production options for better environment
    Acar, Canan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 218 : 835 - 849
  • [4] A review on rapid responsive energy storage technologies for frequency regulation in modern power systems
    Akram, Umer
    Nadarajah, Mithulananthan
    Shah, Rakibuzzaman
    Milano, Federico
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 120
  • [5] The eco-efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants in the city of Mashhad using emergy and life cycle analyses
    Alizadeh, Sadegh
    Zafari-Koloukhi, Hamid
    Rostami, Fatemeh
    Rouhbakhsh, Masoud
    Avami, Akram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 249
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, IEA TECHNOLOGY ROADM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2018, OPT PROD LOW CARB HY
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, REEEMD22A
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2015, IRENA BATT STOR REN
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2020, IRENA EL STOR VAL FR