Performance test of dosimetric services in the EU member states and Switzerland for the routine assessment of individual doses (photon, beta and neutron)

被引:40
作者
Bordy, JM
Stadtmann, H
Ambrosi, P
Bartlett, DT
Christensen, P
Colgan, T
Hyvönen, H
机构
[1] IPSN, DPEA, SEC, F-92265 Fontenay Aux Roses, France
[2] Austrian Res Ctr Seibersdorf, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
[3] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-38023 Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Natl Radiol Protect Board, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England
[5] Riso Natl Lab, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[6] Radiol Protect Inst Ireland, Dublin 14, Ireland
[7] Radiat & Nucl Safety Author, STUK, FIN-00881 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033054
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The results are given of a consolidated performance test for whole-body, and extremity personal dosemeters broadly representative of those in use in the EU member states and Switzerland. Beta, photon and neutron personal dosemeters were used to assess the routine services ability to determine and report personal dose equivalents. In total, 69 sets of dosemeters were entered in the test by 34 services. About 1000 dosemeters were irradiated. One purpose of the consolidated performance test and the analysis of the results was to enable the assessment of criteria for the acceptability of the dosimetry of routine services. It was assumed that each service would have already done a type test before performing routine dosimetry: the radiation fields were chosen to simulate, as far as possible, workplace radiation fields by mixing combining energies and incident angles. The results of photon dosemeters were good for all fields except for R-F. Beta test results showed that many types of dosemeter were not able accurately to determine personal dose equivalent when large incident angles and low energies were encountered. Neutron dosimetry, results were very dependent on the dosemeter type and the dose calculation algorithm. Fast neutron fields were generally well measured, but particular problems were noted in the determination of intermediate energy fields. This illustrates the importance of such a field for calibration purposes. Of particular concern from a radiological protection point of view was the large number of results for beta and neutron dosemeters underestimating personal dose equivalent. A considerable over-response was noted in few cases. This is one of three papers produced by the EURADOS action group. Harmonisation and Dosimetric Quality Assurance in Individual Monitoring for External Radiation. The other two papers are included in this issue of Radiation Protection Dosimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 154
页数:48
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ALEINIKOV VE, 1999, IAEATECDOC1126, P13
[2]   Procedures for routine individual dose assessment of external radiation within EU countries and Switzerland - Status of Harmonisation on 1 April 1999 [J].
Ambrosi, P ;
Fantuzzi, E ;
de Carvalho, AF ;
Delgado, A ;
Lindborg, L ;
Bartlett, DT .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2000, 89 (1-2) :7-51
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SAF SER IAEA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 4032012 WST
[5]  
Bohm J., 1986, PTBDOS13
[6]  
BOHM J, 1984, P INT BET DOS S WASH
[7]  
BOHM J, 1999, IAEATECDOC1126, P85
[8]  
BRIESMEITER JF, 1997, LA12625M
[9]  
BUERMANN L, 1999, PTBDOS32
[10]  
CHARTIER JL, 1995, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V61, P57