Effects of uterine preservation on long-term subjective outcomes of sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

被引:11
作者
Ng, Soo-Cheen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tsui, Kwong-Pang [4 ]
Huang, Litz [1 ]
Chen, Gin-Den [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 110,Sect 1,Chien Kuo N Rd, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ, Inst Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Chung Shan Med Univ, Sch Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[4] Kuang Tien Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
Long-term subjective outcome; Pelvic organ prolapse; Sacrospinous ligament fixation; Uterine preservation; HYSTERECTOMY; COLPOPEXY; SURGERY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.07.006
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the long-term subjective outcomes in women who underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation with and without uterine preservation for treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. Study design: Two hundred and ten women with POP-Q >= stage III uterovaginal prolapse, who underwent sacrospinous ligament fixation from January 1994 to December 2007 were included. Patient Global Impression of Improvement was used to assess the surgical outcome in July 2016. Primary outcome measures were subjective success rate and current satisfaction. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used for analysis. Results: The mean follow-up was 13.3 years (range 8.5-22.6 years). One hundred and thirty-nine patients were successfully interviewed and analyzed. The cumulative subjective success rate was 88.5% and current satisfaction was 77.7%. The repeat surgery rate was 2.9%. There were no significant differences in subjective success (89% vs. 88%) or current satisfaction (78.1% vs. 77.3%) between uterine preservation (n=64) and concomitant hysterectomy (n = 75). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that sacrospinous ligament fixation with uterine preservation had a better subjective outcome at mid-term follow-up but was not significantly different compared with concomitant hysterectomy after long-term follow-up (P = 0.63). The adjusted HR of uterine preservation was 0.75 (95%CI: 0.22-2.12, P = 0.59). Conclusion: Sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without uterine preservation in the treatment of women with uterovaginal prolapse has no significant difference in long-term subjective outcomes and patient satisfaction. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 171
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction, anatomical results and quality of life [J].
Aigmueller, Th. ;
Riss, P. ;
Dungl, A. ;
Bauer, H. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (07) :965-969
[2]   How do patients and surgeons decide on uterine preservation or hysterectomy in apical prolapse? [J].
Anglim, Breffini ;
O'Sullivan, Orfhlaith ;
O'Reilly, Barry .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 29 (08) :1075-1079
[3]   Defining Success After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse [J].
Barber, Matthew D. ;
Brubaker, Linda ;
Nygaard, Ingrid ;
Wheeler, Thomas L., II ;
Schaffer, Joeseph ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Spino, Cathie .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (03) :600-609
[4]   Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence [J].
Chapple, Christopher R. ;
Cruz, Francisco ;
Deffieux, Xavier ;
Milani, Alfredo L. ;
Arlandis, Salvador ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Bauer, Ricarda M. ;
Burkhard, Fiona ;
Cardozo, Linda ;
Castro-Diaz, David ;
Cornu, Jean Nicolas ;
Deprest, Jan ;
Gunnemann, Alfons ;
Gyhagen, Maria ;
Heesakkers, John ;
Koelbl, Heinz ;
MacNeil, Sheila ;
Naumann, Gert ;
Roovers, Jan-Paul W. R. ;
Salvatore, Stefano ;
Sievert, Karl-Dietrich ;
Tarcan, Tufan ;
Van der Aa, Frank ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Wirth, Manfred ;
Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (03) :424-431
[5]   Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy: A Pilot Study Comparing Sacral Hysteropexy to Sacral Colpopexy With Hysterectomy [J].
Cvach, Kristina ;
Geoffrion, Roxana ;
Cundiff, Geoffrey W. .
FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 18 (05) :286-290
[6]   Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse [J].
Hefni, Mohamed A. ;
El-Toukhy, Tarek A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 127 (02) :257-263
[7]   Patient preferences for uterine preservation and hysterectomy in women with pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Korbly, Nicole B. ;
Kassis, Nadine C. ;
Good, Meadow M. ;
Richardson, Monica L. ;
Book, Nicole M. ;
Yip, Sallis ;
Saguan, Docile ;
Gross, Carey ;
Evans, Janelle ;
Lopes, Vrishali V. ;
Harvie, Heidi S. ;
Sung, Vivian W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (05)
[8]   Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy [J].
Lo, Tsia-Shu ;
Pue, Leng Boi ;
Hung, Tai-Ho ;
Wu, Pei-Ying ;
Tan, Yiap Loong .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (07) :1099-1107
[9]   Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse? [J].
Maher, CF ;
Cary, MP ;
Slack, MC ;
Murray, CJ ;
Milligan, M ;
Schluter, P .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2001, 12 (06) :381-384
[10]  
Maher C, 2023, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD012376.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD012376]