The impact of ERAD on recombinant protein secretion in Pichia pastoris (syn Komagataella spp.)

被引:26
作者
Zahrl, Richard J. [1 ,2 ]
Mattanovich, Diethard [1 ,2 ]
Gasser, Brigitte [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] BOKU Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Biotechnol, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
[2] Austrian Ctr Ind Biotechnol ACIB GmbH, Muthgasse 18, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
来源
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM | 2018年 / 164卷 / 04期
关键词
yeast; recombinant protein production; cell factory engineering; endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD); protein secretion;
D O I
10.1099/mic.0.000630
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The yeast Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella spp.) is a popular cell factory for recombinant protein production. Yeasts in general provide a good starting point for cell factory engineering. They are intrinsically robust and easy to manipulate and cultivate. However, their secretory pathway is not evolutionarily adapted to high loads of secretory protein. In particular, more complex proteins, like the antibody fragment (Fab) used in this study, overwhelm the folding and secretion capacity. This triggers cellular stress responses, which may cause excessive intracellular degradation. Previous results have shown that, in fact, about 60% of the newly synthesized Fab is intracellularly degraded. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD) is one possible intracellular degradation pathway for proteins aimed for secretion. We therefore targeted ERAD for cell factory engineering and investigated the impact on recombinant protein secretion in P. pastoris. Three components of the ERAD-L complex, which is involved in the degradation of luminal proteins, and a protein involved in proteasomal degradation, were successfully disrupted in Fab-secreting P. pastoris. Contrary to expectation, the effect on secretion was marginal. In the course of more detailed investigation of the impact of ERAD, we took a closer look at the intracellular variants of the recombinant protein. This enabled us to further zero in on the issue of intracellular Fab degradation and exclude an overshooting ER quality control. We propose that a major fraction of the Fab is actually degraded before entering the secretory pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 463
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Davy A.M., Kildegaard H.F., Ersen M.R., Cell factory engineering, Cell Syst, 4, pp. 262-275, (2017)
[2]  
Matthews C.B., Wright C., Kuo A., Colant N., Westoby M., Et al., Reexamining opportunities for therapeutic protein production in eukaryotic microorganisms, Biotechnol Bioeng, 114, pp. 2432-2444, (2017)
[3]  
Demain A.L., Vaishnav P., Production of recombinant proteins by microbes and higher organisms, Biotechnol Adv, 27, pp. 297-306, (2009)
[4]  
Delic M., Gongrich R., Mattanovich D., Gasser B., Engineering of protein folding and secretion-strategies to overcome bottlenecks for efficient production of recombinant proteins, Antioxid Redox Signal, 21, pp. 414-437, (2014)
[5]  
Wells E., Robinson A.S., Cellular engineering for therapeutic protein production: Product quality, host modification, and process improvement, Biotechnol J, (2017)
[6]  
Rabert C., Weinacker D., Pessoa A., Farias J.G., Recombinants proteins for industrial uses: Utilization of Pichia pastoris expression system, Braz J Microbiol, 44, pp. 351-356, (2013)
[7]  
Puxbaum V., Mattanovich D., Gasser B., Quo vadis? The challenges of recombinant protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 99, pp. 2925-2938, (2015)
[8]  
Pfeffer M., Maurer M., Kollensperger G., Hann S., Graf A.B., Et al., Modeling and measuring intracellular fluxes of secreted recombinant protein in Pichia pastoris with a novel 34S labeling procedure, Microb Cell Fact, 10, (2011)
[9]  
Pfeffer M., Maurer M., Stadlmann J., Grass J., Delic M., Et al., Intracellular interactome of secreted antibody Fab fragment in Pichia pastoris reveals its routes of secretion and degradation, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 93, pp. 2503-2512, (2012)
[10]  
Xie W., Ng D.T., ERAD substrate recognition in budding yeast, Semin Cell Dev Biol, 21, pp. 533-539, (2010)