Sources of fine particles in the South Coast area, California

被引:34
作者
Kim, Eugene [1 ]
Turkiewicz, Katarzyna [1 ]
Zulawnick, Sylvia A. [1 ]
Magliano, Karen L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95812 USA
关键词
South Coast Basin; Speciation trends network; Source apportionment; PM2.5; POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION; FACTOR-ANALYTIC MODELS; LOS-ANGELES BASIN; LEAST-SQUARES; CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION; PARTICULATE MATTER; ATLANTA AEROSOL; RECEPTOR MODEL; ORGANIC-CARBON; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.037
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PM2.5 (particulate matter less than 2.5 mu m in aerodynamic diameter) speciation data collected between 2003 and 2005 at two United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Speciation Trends Network monitoring sites in the South Coast area, California were analyzed to identify major PM2.5 sources as a part of the State Implementation Plan development. Eight and nine major PM2.5 sources were identified in LA and Rubidoux, respectively, through PMF2 analyses. Similar to a previous study analyzing earlier data (Kim and Hopke, 2007a), secondary particles contributed the most to the PM2.5 concentrations: 53% in LA and 59% in Rubidoux. The next highest contributors were diesel emissions (11%) in LA and Gasoline vehicle emissions (10%) in Rubidoux. Most of the source contributions were lower than those from the earlier study. However, the average source contributions from airborne soil, sea salt, and aged sea salt in LA and biomass smoke in Rubidoux increased. To validate the apportioned sources in this study, PMF2 results were compared with those obtained from EPA PMF (US EPA, 2005). Both models identified the same number of major sources and the resolved source profiles and contributions were similar at the two monitoring sites. The minor differences in the results caused by the differences in the least square algorithm and non-negativity constraints between two models did not affect the source identifications. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3095 / 3100
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUIDANCE USE MODELS
[2]  
*ARB, 2007, S COAST AIR BAS STAF
[3]   Trends in fine particle concentration and chemical composition in Southern California [J].
Christoforou, CS ;
Salmon, LG ;
Hannigan, MP ;
Solomon, PA ;
Cass, GR .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2000, 50 (01) :43-53
[4]  
Eatough D.J., 1990, Transactions: Visibility and fine particles, P146
[5]   RECEPTOR MODELING OF AIRBORNE IONIC SPECIES COLLECTED IN SCAQS [J].
GAO, N ;
CHENG, MD ;
HOPKE, PK .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1994, 28 (08) :1447-1470
[6]   A comparison of the UCD/CIT air quality model and the CMB source-receptor model for primary airborne particulate matter [J].
Held, T ;
Ying, Q ;
Kleeman, MJ ;
Schauer, JJ ;
Fraser, MP .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (12) :2281-2297
[7]   INDIVIDUAL PARTICLE TYPES IN THE AEROSOL OF PHOENIX, ARIZONA [J].
KATRINAK, KA ;
ANDERSON, JR ;
BUSECK, PR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 29 (02) :321-329
[8]   Sources of fine particles in a rural Midwestern US area [J].
Kim, E ;
Hopke, PK ;
Kenski, DM ;
Koerber, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (13) :4953-4960
[9]   Source identification of Atlanta aerosol by positive matrix factorization [J].
Kim, E ;
Hopke, PK ;
Edgerton, ES .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2003, 53 (06) :731-739
[10]   Incorporation of parametric factors into multilinear receptor model studies of Atlanta aerosol [J].
Kim, E ;
Hopke, PK ;
Paatero, P ;
Edgerton, ES .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (36) :5009-5021