Hospitality innovation strategies: Robustness analysis of paths to firm performance

被引:13
作者
Ebersberger, Bernd [1 ]
Herstad, Sverre J. [2 ]
Nordli, Anne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Dept Innovat Management, Schwerzstr 40, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol & Human Geog, POB 1096, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[3] Inland Norway Univ, Fac Econ & Org Sci, Postboks 400, N-2418 Elverum, Norway
关键词
Innovation strategy; Firm performance; Hospitality; CIS data; Reproduction; Replication; Robustness; Specification curve analysis; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS SERVICES; EMPLOYMENT GROWTH; TOURISM; IMPACT; LEVEL; INVESTMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104310
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Empirical knowledge on the relationship between innovation and firm performance in the hospitality industry is important for theoretical progress and for decision making. Martin-Rios and Ciobanu?s (2019) recent contribution identifies eight different innovation strategies being significantly associated with firm performance including the ambitious strategy of simultaneously innovating products, processes, organizations, and marketing. By replicating the analysis and testing the robustness of the results with a specification curve analysis using the same dataset, we find only three strategies to be robustly associated with firm performance. All three include process innovation as a necessary component: i) a pure backstage-oriented strategy of process and organizational innovation that can be ii) extended with product innovation and iii) a frontstage-oriented strategy, where marketing innovations complement new products and processes. This substantiates the relevance of the processbased view of innovation in services and call for efforts in theorizing about how different configurations of innovation strategies can represent paths to firm performance.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Is the Welfare State Relevant for Economic Growth? Evidence for Portugal [J].
Bacao, Pedro ;
Simoes, Marta .
COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 62 (03) :494-520
[2]   INVESTMENT IN HUMAN-CAPITAL - A THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS [J].
BECKER, GS .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1962, 70 (05) :9-49
[3]  
Block J., 2018, Management Review Quarterly, V68, P355, DOI [10.1007/s11301-018-0149-3, DOI 10.1007/S11301-018-0149-3]
[4]  
Bogliacino Francesco, 2011, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, V22, P41, DOI 10.1016/j.strueco.2010.11.002
[5]  
Bogliacino F., 2014, EconomiA, V15, P141, DOI [10.1016/j.econ.2014.04.002, DOI 10.1016/J.ECON.2014.04.002]
[6]   Modeling the virtuous circle of innovation. A test on Italian firms [J].
Bogliacino, Francesco ;
Lucchese, Matteo ;
Nascia, Leopoldo ;
Pianta, Mario .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2017, 26 (03) :467-484
[7]   Job creation in business services: Innovation, demand, and polarisation [J].
Bogliacino, Francesco ;
Lucchese, Matteo ;
Pianta, Mario .
STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2013, 25 :95-109
[8]   Innovation and Employment: a Reinvestigation using Revised Pavitt classes [J].
Bogliacino, Francesco ;
Pianta, Mario .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) :799-809
[9]   How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity [J].
Boschma, Ron ;
Eriksson, Rikard ;
Lindgren, Urban .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2009, 9 (02) :169-190
[10]   Reporting errors and biases in published empirical findings: Evidence from innovation research [J].
Bruns, Stephan B. ;
Asanov, Igor ;
Bode, Rasmus ;
Dunger, Melanie ;
Funk, Christoph ;
Hassan, Sherif M. ;
Hauschildt, Julia ;
Heinisch, Dominik ;
Kempa, Karol ;
Koenig, Johannes ;
Lips, Johannes ;
Verbeck, Matthias ;
Wolfschuetz, Eva ;
Buenstorf, Guido .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (09)