Time-Domain Model for Predicting Aerodynamic Loads on a Slender Support Structure for Fatigue Design

被引:15
作者
Chang, Byungik [1 ]
Sarkar, Partha [2 ]
Phares, Brent [3 ]
机构
[1] W Texas A&M Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Canyon, TX 79016 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Bridge Engn Ctr, Ames, IA 50010 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE | 2010年 / 136卷 / 06期
关键词
Buffeting; Vortices; Aerodynamics; Poles; Fatigue; Cyclic loads; Models; Time factors; Vortex shedding; Time-domain model; Indicial function; Aerodynamic admittance function; Slender support structure; Light pole; Fatigue design; INDICIAL FUNCTIONS; BRIDGE DECK; FORCES; FORMULATION; ADMITTANCE;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000122
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents the development of a universal model for predicting cyclic aerodynamic loads originating from buffeting, self-excited, and vortex shedding on a slender support structure in the time domain that can be used to predict its fatigue life. To accomplish this development, long-term monitoring was performed on a high mast light pole (HMLP) and the field data were used to validate the developed mathematical model. Wind-tunnel tests were conducted on the dodecagonal (12-sided) cylindrical cross section of the light pole to obtain the necessary aerodynamic parameters such as static force coefficients, Strouhal number, and indicial functions for buffeting that appear in the postulated model. Furthermore, these aerodynamic parameters were cast into a coupled dynamic model for predicting the response of any HMLP in time domain from vortex shedding and buffeting.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 746
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals
[2]   Time domain vs. frequency domain characterization of aeroelastic forces for bridge deck sections [J].
Caracoglia, L ;
Jones, NP .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2003, 91 (03) :371-402
[3]   Advances in modeling of aerodynamic forces on bridge decks [J].
Chen, XZ ;
Kareem, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2002, 128 (11) :1193-1205
[4]   Time domain flutter and buffeting response analysis of bridges [J].
Chen, XZ ;
Matsumoto, M ;
Kareem, A .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 2000, 126 (01) :7-16
[5]  
CHOWDHURY AG, 2004, WIND STRUCT, V92, P23
[6]  
Connor RobertJ., 2006, FIELD INSTRUMENTATIO
[7]   Aerodynamic admittance functions and buffeting forces for bridges via indicial functions [J].
Costa, C. .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2007, 23 (03) :413-428
[8]   Application of indicial functions in bridge deck aeroelasticity [J].
Costa, Carlotta ;
Borri, Claudio .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2006, 94 (11) :859-881
[9]   Identification of vortex-induced-response parameters in time domain [J].
Gupta, H ;
Sarkar, PP ;
Mehta, KC .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1996, 122 (11) :1031-1037
[10]  
JAMES WD, 1976, THESIS IOWA STATE U