Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms in pediatric patients: combined systematic review of patient-level data and multicenter retrospective review

被引:9
作者
Shlobin, Nathan A. [1 ]
Raz, Eytan [5 ,6 ]
Shapiro, Maksim [5 ,6 ]
Moretti, Luke [5 ,6 ]
Cantrell, Donald R. [2 ,4 ]
Lam, Sandi K. [1 ,3 ]
Hurley, Michael C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Ansari, Sameer A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Nossek, Erez [5 ,6 ]
Riina, Howard A. [5 ,6 ]
Nelson, Peter K. [5 ,6 ]
Jahromi, Babak S. [1 ,2 ]
Shaibani, Ali [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Potts, Matthew B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Northwestern Mem Hosp, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Northwestern Mem Hosp, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Div Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp Chicago, Dept Med Imaging, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] NYU, Dept Radiol, Grossman Sch Med,Langone Med Ctr, Bernard & Irene Schwartz Neurointervent Radiol Se, 560 1St Ave, New York, NY 10016 USA
[6] NYU, Dept Neurol Surg, Bernard & Irene Schwartz Neurointervent Radiol Se, Grossman Sch Med,Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
关键词
aneurysm; Pipeline embolization device; pediatric; flow diversion; vascular disorders; PARENT VESSEL OCCLUSION; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSMS; FLOW DIVERSION; DEVICE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.3171/2020.10.PEDS20324
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE Cerebral aneurysms in the pediatric population are rare and optimal treatment strategies are not as well characterized as in adults. The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is an endoluminal flow diverter that is commonly used to treat aneurysms in adults, but experience with this device in children is limited. The authors sought to further characterize PED use and outcomes in this specific population by performing both a systematic review of patient-level data from studies reporting the use of the PED to treat pediatric aneurysms and a retrospective review of their experience. METHODS A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting the use of the PED in pediatric patients (age <= 18 years). Disaggregated data regarding demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Retrospective data from the authors' two institutions were also included. RESULTS Thirty studies comprising patient-level data on 43 pediatric patients with 47 aneurysms were identified. An additional 9 patients with 9 aneurysms were included from the authors' institutions for a total of 52 patients with 56 aneurysms. The mean patient age was 11.1 years. Presentations included aneurysm rupture (17.3%) and symptomatic mass effect (23.1%). Aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation in 55.4% of cases, and 73.2% were described as nonsaccular. Imaging follow-up was available for 89.3% with a mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Aneurysm occlusion was reported in 75%, with 1 case each (1.8%) demonstrating significant in-stent stenosis and parent vessel occlusion. Clinical follow-up was reported in 90.4% with a mean follow-up of 14.7 months. Good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 or Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5) were reported in 65.4% of the total population. Two major complications were reported, including 1 death. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial differences in aneurysm location and type between published pediatric and adult patient populations treated with the PED, the use of the PED in the pediatric population appears to be safe. While the short-term effectiveness is also similar to that of adults, additional studies are needed to further characterize the long OBJECTIVE Cerebral aneurysms in the pediatric population are rare and optimal treatment strategies are not as well characterized as in adults. The Pipeline embolization device (PED) is an endoluminal flow diverter that is commonly used to treat aneurysms in adults, but experience with this device in children is limited. The authors sought to further characterize PED use and outcomes in this specific population by performing both a systematic review of patient-level data from studies reporting the use of the PED to treat pediatric aneurysms and a retrospective review of their experience. METHODS A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed to identify studies reporting the use of the PED in pediatric patients (age <= 18 years). Disaggregated data regarding demographics, aneu- rysm characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Retrospective data from the authors' two institutions were also included. RESULTS Thirty studies comprising patient-level data on 43 pediatric patients with 47 aneurysms were identified. An additional 9 patients with 9 aneurysms were included from the authors' institutions for a total of 52 patients with 56 aneurysms. The mean patient age was 11.1 years. Presentations included aneurysm rupture (17.3%) and symptomatic mass effect (23.1%). Aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation in 55.4% of cases, and 73.2% were described as nonsaccular. Imaging follow-up was available for 89.3% with a mean follow-up of 13.3 months. Aneurysm occlusion was reported in 75%, with 1 case each (1.8%) demonstrating significant in-stent stenosis and parent vessel occlusion. Clini- cal follow-up was reported in 90.4% with a mean follow-up of 14.7 months. Good functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 or Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5) were reported in 65.4% of the total population. Two major complications were reported, including 1 death. CONCLUSIONS Despite substantial differences in aneurysm location and type between published pediatric and adult patient populations treated with the PED, the use of the PED in the pediatric population appears to be safe. While the short-term effectiveness is also similar to that of adults, additional studies are needed to further characterize the longterm outcomes and better define the use of this device in pediatric patients.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 676
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: Systematic Review of Disaggregated Individual Patient Data
    Alwakeal, A.
    Shlobin, N. A.
    Golnari, P.
    Metcalf-Doetsch, W.
    Nazari, P.
    Ansari, S. A.
    Hurley, M. C.
    Cantrell, D. R.
    Shaibani, A.
    Jahromi, B. S.
    Potts, M. B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (10) : 1827 - 1833
  • [22] Comparison of pipeline embolization device and flow redirection endoluminal device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Musmar, Basel
    Orscelik, Atakan
    Salim, Hamza
    Musmar, Fares
    Adeeb, Nimer
    El Naamani, Kareem
    Essibayi, Muhammed Amir
    Spellicy, Samantha
    Abdelgadir, Jihad
    Dmytriw, Adam A.
    Patel, Aman B.
    Pereira, Vitor Mendes
    Cuellar-Saenz, Hugo H.
    Guthikonda, Bharat
    Zomorodi, Ali
    Jabbour, Pascal
    Hasan, David
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [23] Safety and Outcomes of the Off-Label Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Pipeline Embolization Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chinnadurai, Anu
    Salih, Mira
    Taussky, Philipp
    Ogilvy, Christopher
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 185 : E786 - E799
  • [24] PREVALENCE OF DENTAL DEFECTS AMONG PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Ajwa, Nancy
    Alhuwayji, Zahra Ahmed Ali
    Masiri, Hanan Mohammed
    Alhaddad, Nidaa Mohammad
    Allaf, Lamees Tawfik
    Al Mutairi, Abdulhakim Muteb Raja
    Al-Lwemi, Nourah
    ANNALS OF DENTAL SPECIALTY, 2022, 10 (04): : 84 - 90
  • [25] Comparison between pipeline embolization device (PED) versus flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) for intracranial aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seyed Farzad Maroufi
    Mohammad Sadegh Fallahi
    Muhammad Waqas
    Othman Bin-Alamer
    Manisha Koneru
    Joanna M Roy
    Jane Khalife
    Hamza A. Shaikh
    Daniel A. Tonetti
    Neurosurgical Review, 48 (1)
  • [26] Outcomes and Complications After the Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms of the Posterior Circulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liang, Fei
    Zhang, Yupeng
    Yan, Peng
    Ma, Chao
    Liang, Shikai
    Jiang, Chuhan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E888 - E895
  • [27] Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Pipeline Embolization Device in Anterior and Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Greco, Elena
    Ghaith, Abdul Karim A.
    Rios-Zermeno, Jorge
    Ghanem, Marc
    Perez-Vega, Carlos
    Kashyap, Samir
    Freeman, W. David
    Miller, David A.
    Huynh, Thien J.
    Bydon, Mohamad
    Middlebrooks, Erik H.
    Sandhu, Sukhwinder J. S.
    Tawk, Rabih G.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 185 : 103 - 112
  • [28] Reported incidence and treatment modalities of giant cerebral aneurysms in the pediatric population: A systematic review and illustrative case report
    O'Neal, Christen M.
    Ernst, Griffin L.
    Hughes, Kendall L.
    Stephens, Tressie M.
    Hendrix, Madeline C.
    Gross, Naina L.
    Bohnstedt, Bradley N.
    Cheema, Ahmed A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 90 : 14 - 20
  • [29] Safety and efficacy of responsive neurostimulation in the pediatric population: Evidence from institutional review and patient-level meta-analysis
    Kerezoudis, Panagiotis
    Gyftopoulos, Argyrios
    Alexander, A. Yohan
    Starnes, Donnie Keith
    Nickels, Katherine C.
    Worrell, Gregory A.
    Wirrell, Elaine C.
    Lundstrom, Brian N.
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Miller, Kai J.
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2022, 129
  • [30] Off-label use of dupilumab for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A multicenter retrospective review
    Igelman, Sean
    Kurta, Anastasia O.
    Sheikh, Umar
    McWilliams, Ashley
    Armbrecht, Eric
    Cullison, Stephanie R. Jackson
    Kress, Douglas W.
    Smith, Anna
    Castelo-Soccio, Leslie
    Treat, James
    Boothe, William D.
    Diaz, Lucia Z.
    Levy, Moise L.
    Patel, Avni
    Lee, Lara Wine
    Fraile-Alonso, M. Carmen
    Antaya, Richard J.
    Shah, Sonal
    Kittler, Nicole
    Arkin, Lisa
    Siegfried, Elaine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 82 (02) : 407 - 411