Comparison of 3 protocols for analgesia control after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Dafna, Lotem [1 ]
Herman, Hadas Ganer [1 ]
Ben-Zvi, Masha [1 ]
Bustan, Mor [1 ]
Sasson, Limor [1 ]
Bar, Jacob [1 ]
Kovo, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Wolfson Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Holon, Israel
关键词
analgesia; cesarean delivery; intravenous paracetamol; ondemand; opioid;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.04.002
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Proper pain control after cesarean delivery is of high clinical importance to the recovery and relief of patients after surgical delivery. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare fixed time interval to on-demand regimens of nonopioid analgesics and to assess whether a protocol that is based on intravenous administration is superior to oral administration. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial performed between April 2017 and May 2018. Patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive 1 of 3 pain relief protocols for the first 48 hours after surgery: (1) the fixed intravenous protocol included intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) 3 times daily with oral ibuprofen twice daily, (2) the fixed oral protocol included oral paracetamol 3 times daily with oral ibuprofen twice daily; if the patient requested additional analgesia, tramadol hydrochloride or dipyrone were given as rescue treatments, (3) the on-demand protocol included oral paracetamol or ibuprofen or dipyrone (based on visual analog scale). Pain intensity was measured and compared with the use of the visual analog scale (range, 0 ([no pain] to 10 [worst pain]). Total doses of pain relief analgesia and maternal and neonatal adverse effects were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study included 127 women who were assigned randomly to the intravenous protocol group (n=41), oral protocol group (n=43), and on-demand protocol group (n=43). There were no between group differences in maternal and pregnancy characteristics, cesarean delivery indications, or surgical technique. The average visual analog scale score was 6.2 +/- 0.8 in the intravenous group, 7.0 +/- 1.1 in the oral group, and 7.5 +/- 0.7 in the on-demand group, in the first 24 hours (P=.01) and 6.4 +/- 0.7, 6.8 +/- 0.9, and 7.4 +/- 0.7 for the total 48 hours, respectively (P<.001). Mean pain score reduction was higher in the intravenous protocol compared with the fixed oral protocol group (4.7 +/- 1.2 vs 4.0 +/- 1.4; P=.02). The median doses of pain relief analgesia in the intravenous group were 5 (interquartile range, 5-7), 6 in the oral group (interquartile range, 4-6), and 4 in the on-demand group (interquartile range, 3-6; P=.001) in the first 24 hours and 9 (interquartile range, 7-10), 9 (interquartile range, 7-10), and 7 (interquartile range, 4-9), respectively, for the total 48 hours (P<.001). There were no "between group" differences in neonatal birthweight or maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: Administration of pain relief analgesia (ibuprofen and acetaminophen) in fixed time intervals (intravenous or oral) after cesarean delivery yielded reduced visual analog scale pain scores compared with an on-demand protocol, despite fewer pain relief drugs consumed in the on-demand group.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 118
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Alam A, 2016, CAN J ANESTH, V63, P61, DOI 10.1007/s12630-015-0520-y
  • [2] Altenau B, 2018, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V217
  • [3] Non-opioid pain management in benign minimally invasive hysterectomy: A systematic review
    Blanton, Emily
    Lamvu, Georgine
    Patanwala, Insiyyah
    Barron, Kenneth I.
    Witzeman, Kathryn
    Tu, Frank F.
    As-Sanie, Sawsan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (06) : 557 - 567
  • [4] Patient-controlled oral analgesia versus nurse-controlled parenteral analgesia after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial
    Bonnal, A.
    Dehon, A.
    Nagot, N.
    Macioce, V.
    Nogue, E.
    Morau, E.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (05) : 535 - 543
  • [5] BONNET B, 2018, EUR J PAIN, V14
  • [6] A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Multimodal Analgesic Techniques in Patients Predicted to Have Severe Pain After Cesarean Delivery
    Booth, Jessica L.
    Harris, Lynnette C.
    Eisenach, James C.
    Pan, Peter H.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (04) : 1114 - 1119
  • [7] Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial
    Davis, KM
    Esposito, MA
    Meyer, BA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (04) : 967 - 971
  • [8] Elia N, 2005, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V103, P1296, DOI 10.1097/00000542-200512010-00025
  • [9] Oral analgesia in the treatment of post-cesarean pain
    Jakobi, P
    Weiner, Z
    Solt, I
    Alpert, I
    Itskovitz-Eldor, J
    Zimmer, EZ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01): : 61 - 64
  • [10] KEHLET H, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P1048