Strategies for Coping with Work Stressors and Family Stressors: Scale Development and Validation

被引:25
作者
Clark, Malissa A. [1 ]
Michel, Jesse S. [2 ]
Early, Rebecca J. [3 ]
Baltes, Boris B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Dept Psychol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
Work-family; Coping strategies; Scale development; Inductive; Stressors; MODERATING INFLUENCE; CONFLICT; PERSONALITY; MODEL; ANTECEDENTS; HOME; VARIABLES; BENEFITS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s10869-014-9356-7
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Both individuals and organizations benefit when workers can effectively cope with stressors in the work and family domains. This study takes an inductive approach to the development of a work stressor coping scale and a family stressor coping scale. In phase one, a comprehensive list of coping strategies was generated through a multi-step content analysis of qualitative interviews. In phase two, the content validity of the work stressor and family stressor coping strategy scales was established using data from three samples; and in phase three, convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity evidence were obtained using data from two samples. A multi-step content analysis of qualitative interview data was used to develop a list of 365 coping strategy statements (182 work and 183 family) representing 11 work and 14 family stressor coping strategies. Multiple samples were used to reduce the number of scale items, and establish evidence for the scales' content, construct, and criterion-related validity. The final work stressor coping scale consisted of 36 items assessing 12 different strategies, and the final family stressor coping scale consisted of 45 items assessing 15 different strategies. Findings from the present study suggest that individuals may use a wider variety of strategies to cope with work stressors and family stressors than previously thought, and these strategies may be differentially effective depending on the stressor domain (i.e., work or family) and outcome (e.g., work-to-family conflict vs. family-to-work conflict). The inductive nature of our study resulted in a comprehensive and domain-specific scales assessing how individuals cope with work stressors and family stressors.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 638
页数:22
相关论文
共 83 条
[11]   The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research [J].
Behrend, Tara S. ;
Sharek, David J. ;
Meade, Adam W. ;
Wiebe, Eric N. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (03) :800-813
[12]  
Behson Scott J, 2002, J Occup Health Psychol, V7, P324, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.7.4.324
[13]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[14]   THE CONTAGION OF STRESS ACROSS MULTIPLE ROLES [J].
BOLGER, N ;
DELONGIS, A ;
KESSLER, RC ;
WETHINGTON, E .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1989, 51 (01) :175-183
[15]  
Bond J.T., 1998, 1997 NATL STUDY CHAN
[16]  
Brown T. A., 2015, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.19030/AJBE.V6I3.7818
[17]   A meta-analytic review of work-family conflict and its antecedents [J].
Byron, K .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 67 (02) :169-198
[18]   CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].
CAMPBELL, DT ;
FISKE, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105
[19]   Personality and role variables as predictors of three forms of work-family conflict [J].
Carlson, DS .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1999, 55 (02) :236-253
[20]   Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict [J].
Carlson, DS ;
Kacmar, KM ;
Williams, LJ .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2000, 56 (02) :249-276