MRI predictors of tumor-positive margins after breast-conserving surgery

被引:7
作者
Bahl, Manisha [1 ,3 ]
Baker, Jay A. [1 ]
Kinsey, Emily N. [2 ]
Ghate, Sujata, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, DUMC Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 55 Fruit St,WAC 240, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Ductal carcinoma in situ; Magnetic resonance imaging; Surgical margins; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; CONSERVATION SURGERY; CANCER; LUMPECTOMY; BIOPSY; IRRADIATION; MASTECTOMY; EXCISION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to identify predictors of tumor-positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive women who underwent DCE MRI before breast-conserving surgery from 2005 to 2014. Patient demographics, indication for surgery, MRI findings, biopsy pathology results, and surgical outcomes were reviewed. The unpaired t-test and chi-square test were used to compare the positive and negative margins groups. Results: 554 women (mean age, 56; range, 26-90) underwent DCE MRI before 575 breast-conserving surgeries for invasive carcinoma (n = 473) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 102). Positive margins requiring reexcision occurred in 19.7% (93/473) of surgeries for invasive carcinoma and 31.4% (32/102) of surgeries for DCIS. For invasive carcinoma surgeries, positive margins were more common when MRI demonstrated the finding of non-mass enhancement (NME) rather than the finding of enhancing mass (33.8% [22/65] versus 16.9% [61/360], p < 0.01). Tumor size on MRI was significantly larger in the positive margins group (2.5 cm versus 1.9 cm, p < 0.001). Positive margins were more common with invasive lobular rather than invasive ductal histology at core biopsy (38.3% [18/47] versus 16.0% [56/350], p < 0.001). For DCIS surgeries, there were no significant differences in positive margin rates related to MRI features. Conclusion: For invasive carcinoma surgeries, positive margins are associated with NME on MRI, larger tumor size on MRI, and lobular histology at core biopsy. These findings may be used to predict which patients are at risk for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 49
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Prediction of positive margins following breast conserving surgery
    Agostinho, Jeremy L.
    Zhao, Xiuhua
    Sun, Weihong
    Laronga, Christine
    Kiluk, John V.
    Chen, Dung-Tsa
    Lee, M. Catherine
    [J]. BREAST, 2015, 24 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [2] Significance of Breast Lesion Descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI Lexicon
    Agrawal, Garima
    Su, Min-Ying
    Nalcioglu, Orhan
    Feig, Stephen A.
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (07) : 1363 - 1380
  • [3] Optimizing Surgical Margins in Breast Conservation
    Ananthakrishnan, Preya
    Balci, Fatih Levent
    Crowe, Joseph P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 2012
  • [4] [Anonymous], ACR PRACT PAR PERF C
  • [5] Prediction of positive resection margins in patients with non-palpable breast cancer
    Barentsz, M. W.
    Postma, E. L.
    van Dalen, T.
    van den Bosch, M. A. A. J.
    Miao, H.
    Gobardhan, P. D.
    van den Hout, L. E.
    Pijnappel, R. M.
    Witkamp, A. J.
    van Diest, P. J.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Verkooijen, H. M.
    [J]. EJSO, 2015, 41 (01): : 106 - 112
  • [6] Evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a systematic review
    Bignotti, Bianca
    Signori, Alessio
    Valdora, Francesca
    Rossi, Federica
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Durando, Manuela
    Mariscotto, Giovanna
    Tagliafico, Alberto
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 90 (1070)
  • [7] Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique
    Chagpar, AB
    Martin, RCG
    Hagendoorn, LJ
    Chao, C
    McMasters, KM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (04) : 399 - 402
  • [8] Positive Margins After Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer
    Clough, Krishna B.
    Gouveia, Pedro F.
    Benyahi, Djazia
    Massey, Eleanore J. D.
    Russ, Elisabeth
    Sarfati, Isabelle
    Nos, Claude
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (13) : 4247 - 4253
  • [9] de Roos MA, 2006, INT SURG, V91, P100
  • [10] Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials
    Darby S.
    McGale P.
    Correa C.
    Taylor C.
    Arriagada R.
    Clarke M.
    Cutter D.
    Davies C.
    Ewertz M.
    Godwin J.
    Gray R.
    Pierce L.
    Whelan T.
    Wang Y.
    Peto R.
    Albain K.
    Anderson S.
    Barlow W.
    Bergh J.
    Bliss J.
    Buyse M.
    Cameron D.
    Carrasco E.
    Coates A.
    Collins R.
    Costantino J.
    Cuzick J.
    Davidson N.
    Davies K.
    Delmestri A.
    Di Leo A.
    Dowsett M.
    Elphinstone P.
    Evans V.
    Gelber R.
    Gettins L.
    Geyer C.
    Goldhirsch A.
    Gregory C.
    Hayes D.
    Hill C.
    Ingle J.
    Jakesz R.
    James S.
    Kaufmann M.
    Kerr A.
    MacKinnon E.
    McHugh T.
    Norton L.
    Ohashi Y.
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9804) : 1707 - 1716