Impacts of Disk Rock Sample Geometric Dimensions on Shear Fracture Behavior in a Punch Shear Test

被引:5
作者
Zhu, Tantan [1 ]
Li, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Changan Univ, Sch Highway, Xian 710064, Peoples R China
来源
CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES | 2021年 / 126卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Punch shear test; shear behavior; suggested geometric dimensions; particle flow code simulation; fracture process;
D O I
10.32604/cmes.2021.014284
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Punch shear tests have been widely used to determine rock shear mechanical properties but without a standard sample geometric dimension suggestion. To investigate the impacts of sample geometric dimensions on shear behaviors in a punch shear test, simulations using Particle Flow Code were carried out. The effects of three geometric dimensions (i.e., disk diameter, ratio of shear surface diameter to disk diameter, and ratio of disk height to shear surface diameter) were discussed. Variations of shear strength, shear stiffness, and shear dilatancy angles were studied, and the fracture processes and patterns of samples were investigated. Then, normal stress on the shear surface during test was analyzed and a suggested disk geometric dimension was given. Simulation results show that when the ratio of the shear surface diameter to the disk diameter and the ratio of disk height to the shear surface diameter is small enough, the shear strength, shear stiffness, and shear dilatancy angles are extremely sensitive to the three geometric parameters. If the ratio of surface diameter to disk diameter is too large or the ratio of disk height to surface diameter is too small, a part of the sample within the shear surface will fail due to macro tensile cracks, which is characterized by break off. Samples with a greater ratio of disk height to shear surface diameter, namely when the sample is relatively thick, crack from one end to the other while others crack from both ends towards the middle. During test, the actual normal stress on the shear surface is greater than the target value because of the extra compressive stress from the part of sample outside shear surface.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 477
页数:21
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Rock fracture toughness testing in Mode II - punch-through shear test [J].
Backers, T ;
Stephansson, O ;
Rybacki, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2002, 39 (06) :755-769
[2]   Scale effect on the shear behaviour of rock joints based on a numerical study [J].
Bahaaddini, M. ;
Hagan, P. C. ;
Mitra, R. ;
Hebblewhite, B. K. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2014, 181 :212-223
[3]   Evolution Process of Natural Rock Joint Roughness during Direct Shear Tests [J].
Ge, Yunfeng ;
Tang, Huiming ;
Eldin, M. A. M. Ez ;
Wang, Liangqing ;
Wu, Qiong ;
Xiong, Chengren .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2017, 17 (05)
[4]  
Girgin ZC, 2007, ACI STRUCT J, V104, P278
[5]   Experimental Study on the Shear Mechanical Behavior of Sandstone Under Normal Tensile Stress Using a New Double-Shear Testing Device [J].
Huang, Da ;
Zhu, Tantan .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2019, 52 (09) :3467-3474
[6]   Experimental and numerical study on the strength and hybrid fracture of sandstone under tension-shear stress [J].
Huang, Da ;
Zhu, Tan-Tan .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2018, 200 :387-400
[7]   A dynamic punch method to quantify the dynamic shear strength of brittle solids [J].
Huang, S. ;
Feng, X. T. ;
Xia, K. .
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2011, 82 (05)
[8]   Experimental Study on Shear Behavior of a Rock Discontinuity Under Various Thermal, Hydraulic and Mechanical Conditions [J].
Kim, Taehyun ;
Jeon, Seokwon .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2019, 52 (07) :2207-2226
[9]   A new understanding of punch-through shear testing [J].
Li, L. R. ;
Deng, J. H. ;
Liu, J. F. ;
Zheng, J. ;
Chen, T. ;
Deng, C. F. .
GEOTECHNIQUE LETTERS, 2017, 7 (02) :129-135
[10]   Development of a viscoelastoplastic model for a bedded argillaceous rock from laboratory triaxial tests [J].
Li, Zhenze ;
Thanh Son Nguyen ;
Su, Grant ;
Labrie, Denis ;
Barnichon, Jean Dominique .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 54 (03) :359-372