Lumber Spinal Steroid Injections and Infection Risk after Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Patel, Harshadkumar A. [1 ]
Cheppalli, Naga Suresh [2 ]
Bhandarkar, Amit Wasudeo [3 ]
Patel, Vidhi [4 ]
Singla, Anuj [5 ]
机构
[1] Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 100 Woods Rd, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, VA Hosp, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] SSM Hlth St Marys Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Centralia, IL USA
[4] Zilmed Inc, Marietta, GA USA
[5] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Dept Orthopaed, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
Lumbar spine surgery; Lumbosacral region; Spinal injections; Surgical wound infection; Systematic review; EPIDURAL CORTICOSTEROID INJECTION; INCREASE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Lumbar spinal steroid injections (LSSI) are universally used as preferred diagnostic or therapeutic treatment options before major spinal surgeries. Some recent studies have reported higher risks of surgical-site infection (SSI) for spinal surgeries performed after injections, while others have overlooked such associations. The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the associations between preoperative LSSI and postoperative infection following subsequent lumbar decompression and fusion procedures. Three databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, were searched for relevant studies that reported the association of spinal surgery SSI with spinal injections. After the comprehensive sequential screening of the titles, abstracts, and full articles, nine studies were included in a systematic review, and eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. Studies were critically appraised for bias using the validated MINOR (methodological index for non-randomized studies) score. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the time between LSSI and surgery and the type of lumbar spine surgery. Meta-analysis showed that preoperative LSSI within 30 days of lumbar spine surgery was associated with significantly higher postoperative infection compared with the control group (OR,1.79; 95% CI, 1.08-2.96). Based on subgroup analysis, lumbar spine fusion surgery within 30 days of preoperative LSSI was associated with significantly high-infection rates (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 2.12-3.35), while no association was found between preoperative LSSI and postoperative infection for lumbar spine decompression surgeries. In summary, given the absence of high-level studies in the literature, careful clinical interpretation of the results should be performed. The overall risk of SSI was slightly higher if the spinal surgery was performed within 30 days after LSSIs. The risk was higher for lumbar fusion cases but not for decompression-only procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of risdiplam in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pascual-Morena, Carlos
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Martinez-Garcia, Irene
    Moreno-Herraiz, Nerea
    Alvarez-Bueno, Celia
    Saz-Lara, Alicia
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 44 (01): : 97 - 105
  • [32] Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement Methods in Pediatrics and Adolescents Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    De Vega, Brigita
    Navarro, Aida Ribera
    Gibson, Alexander
    Kalaskar, Deepak M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 12 (04) : 677 - 688
  • [33] Preoperative Versus Extended Postoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection During Spinal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Blaine T. Phillips
    Emma S. Sheldon
    Vwaire Orhurhu
    Robert A. Ravinsky
    Monika E. Freiser
    Morteza Asgarzadeh
    Omar Viswanath
    Alan D. Kaye
    Marie Roguski
    Advances in Therapy, 2020, 37 : 2710 - 2733
  • [34] Preoperative Versus Extended Postoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection During Spinal Surgery: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Phillips, Blaine T.
    Sheldon, Emma S.
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Ravinsky, Robert A.
    Freiser, Monika E.
    Asgarzadeh, Morteza
    Viswanath, Omar
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Roguski, Marie
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2020, 37 (06) : 2710 - 2733
  • [35] Pregabalin and gabapentin in neuropathic pain management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davari, Majid
    Amani, Bahman
    Amani, Behnam
    Khanijahani, Ahmad
    Akbarzadeh, Arash
    Shabestan, Rouhollah
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2020, 33 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [36] Prevalence of surgical site infection and risk factors in patients after foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Jiaguo
    Zhang, Luping
    Zhang, Jing
    Asadi, Kamran
    Farzan, Ramyar
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [37] Acupotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kwon, Chan-Young
    Yoon, Sang-hoon
    Lee, Boram
    Leem, Jungtae
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (03)
  • [38] Associates of Insomnia in People with Chronic Spinal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bilterys, Thomas
    Siffain, Carolie
    De Maeyer, Ina
    Van Looveren, Eveline
    Mairesse, Olivier
    Nijs, Jo
    Meeus, Mira
    Ickmans, Kelly
    Cagnie, Barbara
    Goubert, Dorien
    Danneels, Lieven
    Moens, Maarten
    Malfliet, Anneleen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (14)
  • [39] The effectiveness of neuromuscular spinal manipulation- an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lo, Chi Ngai
    Tsang, Eric W.
    Ngai, Shirley Pui Ching
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2024, 54
  • [40] Adverse Events After Cervical Spinal Manipulation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pankrath, Natalie
    Nilsson, Svenja
    Ballenberger, Nikolaus
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2024, 27 (04)