Multi-level fleet size optimization for containers handling using double-cycling strategy

被引:1
作者
El-Abbasy, Mohammed Saeed [1 ]
Ahmed, Essmeil [1 ]
Zayed, Tarek [2 ]
Alfalah, Ghasan [3 ]
Alkass, Sabah [4 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Bldg Civil & Environm Engn, Montreal, PQ H3G 1M8, Canada
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate BRE, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] King Saud Univ, Deptartment Architecture & Bldg Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] United Arab Emirates Univ, Coll Engn, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Container Handling; Fleet Size; Multi-level Optimization; NSGA-II; Double-Cycling; BERTH ALLOCATION PROBLEM; CRANE SCHEDULING PROBLEM; STORAGE SPACE ALLOCATION; INTEGRATED QUAY CRANE; YARD CRANE; ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM; TRUCK; TERMINALS; FORMULATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114526
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Every few years, larger containerized vessels are introduced to the market to accommodate the increase in global trade. Although increasing the capacity of vessels results in maximizing the amount of imported and exported goods per voyage, yet it is accompanied with new challenges to terminal planners. One of the primary challenges is minimizing the vessel turnaround time with the least possible cost. In this context, this paper presents the development of a multi-level optimization model using the elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) to determine the optimal or near-optimal fleet size combination of the different container handling equipment used in the terminal. The model aims to minimize two conflicting objective functions, namely, vessel turnaround time and total handling cost. Furthermore, the model considers a double-cycling strategy for the container handling process to achieve increased productivity and eventually more reduction in the vessel turnaround time. The model was implemented on a real-life case study to demonstrate its efficiency and the benefit of employing the double-cycling strategy compared with the traditional single-cycling strategy. The results demonstrated the efficiency of employing the double-cycling strategy by providing a reduction of above 20% in both the vessel turnaround time and the total handling cost and an increase of above 25% in the productivity when compared to the traditional single-cycling strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   MIP approaches for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment and scheduling problem [J].
Agra, Agostinho ;
Oliveira, Maryse .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 264 (01) :138-148
[2]  
Ahmed E., 2015, THESIS CONCORDIA U
[3]   The Quay Crane Scheduling Problem [J].
Al-Dhaheri, Noura ;
Diabat, Ali .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2015, 36 :87-94
[4]   AN INTEGRATED BERTH ALLOCATION AND YARD ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM FOR BULK PORTS: FORMULATION AND CASE STUDY [J].
Al-Hammadi, Jasem ;
Diabat, Ali .
RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01) :267-284
[5]   Combined quay crane assignment and quay crane scheduling with crane inter-vessel movement and non-interference constraints [J].
Alsoufi, Ghazwan ;
Yang, Xinan ;
Salhi, Abdellah .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2018, 69 (03) :372-383
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J OPTIMIZATION IND E
[7]   A genetic algorithm to solve the storage space allocation problem in a container terminal [J].
Bazzazi, Mohammad ;
Safaei, Nima ;
Javadian, Nikbakhsh .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (01) :44-52
[8]   Dispatching vehicles in a mega container terminal [J].
Bish, EK ;
Chen, FY ;
Leong, YT ;
Nelson, BL ;
Ng, JWC ;
Simchi-Levi, D .
OR SPECTRUM, 2005, 27 (04) :491-506
[9]   Berth allocation problem under uncertainty: A conceptual model using collaborative approach [J].
Budipriyanto, Adi ;
Wirjodirdjo, Budisantoso ;
Pujawan, Nyoman ;
Gurning, Saut .
INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE 2015, IESS 2015, 2015, 4 :429-437
[10]   The integrated yard truck and yard crane scheduling problem: Blenders' decomposition-based methods [J].
Cao, Jin Xin ;
Lee, Der-Horng ;
Chen, Jiang Hang ;
Shi, Qixin .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2010, 46 (03) :344-353