Bringing the policy making perspective in: A political science approach to social acceptance

被引:106
作者
Dermont, Clau [1 ]
Ingold, Karin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kammermann, Lorenz [1 ,2 ]
Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Polit Sci, Fabrikstr 8, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] ETH Domain, Eawag Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci, Uberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Oeschger Ctr Climate Change Res, Falkenpl 16, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social acceptance; Political behavior; Policy studies; Research design; Ecological tax reform; ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; WIND ENERGY; POWER; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; NETWORKS; COALITIONS; ATTITUDES; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.062
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen a growing interest in the concept of social acceptance, especially in the wake of the transition from non-renewable to renewable energy sources. Social acceptance is thereby studied from very different backgrounds and based on distinct conceptualizations. We argue that the reason for the great variety in the use of 'acceptance' is not mainly its interdisciplinary and multidimensionality, but a missing policy making perspective and its insights and knowledge about processes, actors and (in)formal decision-making. This contribution proposes a framework to refine the concept of social acceptance. Taking into account that the stage and specificity of the policy making process heavily influence the response towards RET and the process triggered, we identify three steps that need to be addressed when defining a research design that includes social acceptance: the object and context under scrutiny, the relevant actors, and the roles they play. Our proposed framework thereby adopts a political science point of view and the main research interest deals with political actors deciding upon and implementing future policies.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 368
页数:10
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature [J].
Aitken, Mhairi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (04) :1834-1841
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV ADVOCACY AGENDA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, IMPLEMENTATION OR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SCHWEIZERISCHE DEMOK
[5]  
Barry J, 2011, RENEWABLE ENERGY AND THE PUBLIC: FROM NIMBY TO PARTICIPATION, P29
[6]   Energy Colonialism and the Role of the Global in Local Responses to New Energy Infrastructures in the UK: A Critical and Exploratory Empirical Analysis [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick .
ANTIPODE, 2017, 49 (01) :3-22
[7]   Towards a better understanding of people's responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2015, 24 (03) :311-325
[8]   Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion [J].
Batel, Susana ;
Devine-Wright, Patrick ;
Tangeland, Torvald .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 :1-5
[9]   The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses [J].
Bell, D ;
Gray, T ;
Haggett, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2005, 14 (04) :460-477
[10]   Re-visiting the 'social gap': public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy [J].
Bell, Derek ;
Gray, Tim ;
Haggett, Claire ;
Swaffield, Joanne .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 22 (01) :115-135