Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness

被引:72
作者
Reinhardt, G. Y. [1 ]
Vidovic, D. [2 ]
Hammerton, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Essex, Dept Govt, Wivenhoe Pk, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[2] Univ Essex, Colchester, Essex, England
关键词
public health; wellbeing; loneliness; evaluation; social prescribing; social model of health; OLDER-ADULTS;
D O I
10.1177/1757913920967040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: The aim of this systematic literature review is to assess the impact of social prescribing (SP) programmes on loneliness among participants and the population. Methods: We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search EBSCOHost (CINAHL Complete, eBook Collection, E-Journals, MEDLINE with Full Text, Open Dissertations, PsycARTICLES, and PsycINFO), UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Web of Science Core Collection, and grey literature. We included studies measuring the effectiveness and impact of SP programmes in terms of loneliness. We excluded systematic reviews and studies without evaluations. Due to the absence of confidence intervals and the low number of studies, we conduct no meta-analysis. Results: From 4415 unique citations, nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies do not use uniform measures or randomised samples. All nine studies report positive individual impacts; three report reductions in general practitioner (GP), A&E, social worker, or inpatient/outpatient services; and one shows that belonging to a group reduces loneliness and healthcare usage. Conclusion: The findings of this systematic review indicate that individuals and service providers view SP as a helpful tool to address loneliness. However, evidence variability and the small number of studies make it difficult to draw a conclusion on the extent of the impact and the pathways to achieving positive change. More research is needed into the impact of SP programmes on participants, populations, and communities in terms of loneliness, isolation, and connectedness, especially in light of the surge in SP activity as a key part of pandemic response.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 213
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Admin W., CORONAVIRUS COVID19
[2]  
Age UK Local Government Association (LGA) and the Campaign to End Loneliness, 2016, COMB LON GUID LOC AU
[3]  
Alden S., CIRCLE CTR INT RES C, V60
[4]  
[Anonymous], STATEMENT PREPARED S
[5]   A realist evaluation of social prescribing: an exploration into the context and mechanisms underpinning a pathway linking primary care with the voluntary sector [J].
Bertotti, Marcello ;
Frostick, Caroline ;
Hutt, Patrick ;
Sohanpal, Ratna ;
Carnes, Dawn .
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 19 (03) :232-245
[6]   Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence [J].
Bickerdike, Liz ;
Booth, Alison ;
Wilson, Paul M. ;
Farley, Kate ;
Wright, Kath .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04)
[7]  
Cerb, 2017, COST DISC COMM EX SU
[8]   Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes [J].
Chatterjee, Helen J. ;
Camic, Paul M. ;
Lockyer, Bridget ;
Thomson, Linda J. M. .
ARTS & HEALTH, 2018, 10 (02) :97-123
[9]  
Coop British Red Cross, 2019, TACKL LON AND IS CON
[10]  
Dayson C., 2017, People Place Policy Online, V11, P90, DOI DOI 10.3351/PPP.2017.4839587343