How to tackle the stringent sulfate removal requirements in mine water treatment-A review of potential methods

被引:84
作者
Runtti, Hanna [1 ]
Tolonen, Emma-Tuulia [1 ]
Tuomikoski, Sari [1 ]
Luukkonen, Tero [2 ]
Lassi, Ulla [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Res Unit Sustainable Chem, POB 4300, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
[2] Univ Oulu, Fibre & Particle Engn Res Unit, POB 4300, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Kokkola Univ Consortium Chydenius, Unit Appl Chem, Talonpojankatu 2B, FI-67100 Kokkola, Finland
关键词
Acid mine drainage; Discharge limits; Sulfate; Sulfur recovery; Water contamination; MICROBIAL FUEL-CELL; HEAVY-METAL PRECIPITATION; REVERSE-OSMOSIS BRINES; COAL FLY-ASH; OF-THE-ART; WASTE-WATER; REDUCING BACTERIA; AQUEOUS-SOLUTION; LOW-PH; TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2018.07.018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sulfate (SO42-) is a ubiquitous anion in natural waters. It is not considered toxic, but it may be detrimental to freshwater species at elevated concentrations. Mining activities are one significant source of anthropogenic sulfate into natural waters, mainly due to the exposure of sulfide mineral ores to weathering. There are several strategies for mitigating sulfate release, starting from preventing sulfate formation in the first place and ending at several end-of-pipe treatment options. Currently, the most widely used sulfate-removal process is precipitation as gypsum (CaSO4 center dot 2H(2)O). However, the lowest reachable concentration is theoretically 1500 mg L-1 SO42- due to gypsum's solubility. At the same time, several mines worldwide have significantly more stringent sulfate discharge limits. The purpose of this review is to examine the process options to reach low sulfate levels (< 1500 mg L-1) in mine effluents. Examples of such processes include alternative chemical precipitation methods, membrane technology, biological treatment, ion exchange, and adsorption. In addition, aqueous chemistry and current effluent standards concerning sulfate together with concentrate treatment and sulfur recovery are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 222
页数:16
相关论文
共 243 条
[1]  
Aalto J. M., 2017, Patent application, Patent No. [WO2017037335A1, 2017037335]
[2]  
Adlem C. J. L., 1991, P 4 INT MIN WAT ASS
[3]   Characterization of Two Nanofiltration Membranes for the Separation of Ions from Acid Mine Water [J].
Agboola, Oluranti ;
Mokrani, Touhami ;
Sadiku, Emmanuel Rotimi ;
Kolesnikov, Andrei ;
Olukunle, Olubiyi Isola ;
Maree, Johannes Phillippus .
MINE WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 36 (03) :401-408
[4]   Acid mine drainage treatment by nanofiltration: A study of membrane fouling, chemical cleaning, and membrane ageing [J].
Aguiar, Alice ;
Andrade, Laura ;
Grossi, Luiza ;
Pires, Wadson ;
Amaral, Miriam .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 192 :185-195
[5]   Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: A review [J].
Akther, N. ;
Sodiq, A. ;
Giwa, A. ;
Daer, S. ;
Arafat, H. A. ;
Hasan, S. W. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 281 :502-522
[6]  
Al-Tayyib A.J., 1991, Cement and Concrete Composites, V13, P123, DOI DOI 10.1016/0958-9465(91)90007-5
[7]   Optimization Study for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage Using Membrane Technology [J].
Al-Zoubi, H. ;
Rieger, A. ;
Steinberger, P. ;
Pelz, W. ;
Haseneder, R. ;
Haertel, G. .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 45 (14) :2004-2016
[8]   Neutralization/prevention of acid rock drainage using mixtures of alkaline by-products and sulfidic mine wastes [J].
Alakangas, Lena ;
Andersson, Elin ;
Mueller, Seth .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (11) :7907-7916
[9]   Membrane distillation: A comprehensive review [J].
Alkhudhiri, Abdullah ;
Darwish, Naif ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2012, 287 :2-18
[10]   Synthesis of ettringite: a way to deal with the acid wastewaters of aluminium anodising industry [J].
Alvarez-Ayuso, E ;
Nugteren, HW .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (01) :65-72