DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea)

被引:136
作者
Berry, Tina E. [1 ]
Osterrieder, Sylvia K. [2 ]
Murray, Daithi C. [1 ]
Coghlan, Megan L. [1 ]
Richardson, Anthony J. [3 ]
Grealy, Alicia K. [1 ]
Stat, Michael [1 ]
Bejder, Lars [4 ]
Bunce, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Trace & Environm DNA TrEnD Lab, Dept Environm & Agr, Bentley, WA, Australia
[2] Curtin Univ, Ctr Marine Sci & Technol, Bentley, WA, Australia
[3] CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, EcoSci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia
[4] Murdoch Univ, Cetacean Res Unit, Murdoch, WA, Australia
来源
ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2017年 / 7卷 / 14期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
apex predator; dietary scat analysis; DNA metabarcoding; Neophoca cinerea; next generation sequencing; PREY DNA; SEQUENCES; SAMPLES; FECES;
D O I
10.1002/ece3.3123
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The analysis of apex predator diet has the ability to deliver valuable insights into ecosystem health, and the potential impacts a predator might have on commercially relevant species. The Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) is an endemic apex predator and one of the world's most endangered pinnipeds. Given that prey availability is vital to the survival of top predators, this study set out to understand what dietary information DNA metabarcoding could yield from 36 sea lion scats collected across 1,500km of its distribution in southwest Western Australia. A combination of PCR assays were designed to target a variety of potential sea lion prey, including mammals, fish, crustaceans, cephalopods, and birds. Over 1.2million metabarcodes identified six classes from three phyla, together representing over 80 taxa. The results confirm that the Australian sea lion is a wide-ranging opportunistic predator that consumes an array of mainly demersal fauna. Further, the important commercial species Sepioteuthis australis (southern calamari squid) and Panulirus cygnus (western rock lobster) were detected, but were present in <25% of samples. Some of the taxa identified, such as fish, sharks and rays, clarify previous knowledge of sea lion prey, and some, such as eel taxa and two gastropod species, represent new dietary insights. Even with modest sample sizes, a spatial analysis of taxa and operational taxonomic units found within the scat shows significant differences in diet between many of the sample locations and identifies the primary taxa that are driving this variance. This study provides new insights into the diet of this endangered predator and confirms the efficacy of DNA metabarcoding of scat as a noninvasive tool to more broadly define regional biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:5435 / 5453
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] BASIC LOCAL ALIGNMENT SEARCH TOOL
    ALTSCHUL, SF
    GISH, W
    MILLER, W
    MYERS, EW
    LIPMAN, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 215 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [2] [Anonymous], ATL LIV AUSTR
  • [3] GenBank
    Benson, Dennis A.
    Clark, Karen
    Karsch-Mizrachi, Ilene
    Lipman, David J.
    Ostell, James
    Sayers, Eric W.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2015, 43 (D1) : D30 - D35
  • [4] Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes
    Berry, Oliver
    Bulman, Cathy
    Bunce, Michael
    Coghlan, Megan
    Murray, Daithi C.
    Ward, Robert D.
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2015, 540 : 167 - 181
  • [5] Boyer S., 2015, Food Webs, V3, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.fooweb.2015.02.001, DOI 10.1016/J.FOOWEB.2015.02.001]
  • [6] Pyrosequencing of prey DNA in reptile faeces: analysis of earthworm consumption by slow worms
    Brown, David S.
    Jarman, Simon N.
    Symondson, William O. C.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2012, 12 (02) : 259 - 266
  • [7] Bunce M, 2012, METHODS MOL BIOL, V840, P121, DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_16
  • [8] Combining DNA and morphological analyses of faecal samples improves insight into trophic interactions: a case study using a generalist predator
    Casper, Ruth M.
    Jarman, Simon N.
    Gales, Nicholas J.
    Hindell, Mark A.
    [J]. MARINE BIOLOGY, 2007, 152 (04) : 815 - 825
  • [9] Cooper A., 1994, DNA MUSEUM SPECIMENS
  • [10] Costa DP, 2003, ECOL MONOGR, V73, P27, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0027:EOABDS]2.0.CO