Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices

被引:975
作者
Bernacki, Rachelle E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Block, Susan D. [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Psychosocial Oncol & Palliat Care, Div Adult Palliat Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Aging, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Palliat Care, Boston, MA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
END-OF-LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS; FACULTY-DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM; ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS; CELL LUNG-CANCER; PALLIATIVE CARE; HEALTH-CARE; ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; MEDICARE BENEFICIARIES;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
An understanding of patients' care goals in the context of a serious illness is an essential element of high-quality care, allowing clinicians to align the care provided with what is most important to the patient. Early discussions about goals of care are associated with better quality of life, reduced use of nonbeneficial medical care near death, enhanced goal-consistent care, positive family outcomes, and reduced costs. Existing evidence does not support the commonly held belief that communication about end-of-life issues increases patient distress. However, conversations about care goals are often conducted by physicians who do not know the patient, do not routinely address patients' nonmedical goals, and often fail to provide patients with sufficient information about prognosis to allow appropriate decisions; in addition, they tend to occur so late in the patient's illness that their impact on care processes is reduced. This article (1) reviews the evidence and describes best practices in conversations about serious illness care goals and (2) offers practical advice for clinicians and health care systems about developing a systematic approach to quality and timing of such communication to assure that each patient has a personalized serious illness care plan. Best practices in discussing goals of care include the following: sharing prognostic information, eliciting decision-making preferences, understanding fears and goals, exploring views on trade-offs and impaired function, and wishes for family involvement. Several interventions hold promise in systematizing conversations with patients about serious illness care goals: better education of physicians; systems to identify and trigger early discussions for appropriate patients; patient and family education; structured formats to guide discussions; dedicated, structured sections in the electronic health record for recording information; and continuous measurement. We conclude that communication about serious illness care goals is an intervention that should be systematically integrated into our clinical care structures and processes.
引用
收藏
页码:1994 / 2003
页数:10
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Missed Opportunities for Advance Care Planning Communication During Outpatient Clinic Visits
    Ahluwalia, Sangeeta C.
    Levin, Jennifer R.
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    Gordon, Howard S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [2] A controlled trial of a short course to improve residents' communication with patients at the end of life
    Alexander, Stewart C.
    Keitz, Sheri A.
    Sloane, Richard
    Tulsky, James A.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2006, 81 (11) : 1008 - 1012
  • [3] Executive Summary: Decision Making in Advanced Heart Failure A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
    Allen, Larry A.
    Stevenson, Lynne W.
    Grady, Kathleen L.
    Goldstein, Nathan E.
    Matlock, Daniel D.
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Cook, Nancy R.
    Felker, G. Michael
    Francis, Gary S.
    Hauptman, Paul J.
    Havranek, Edward P.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Mancini, Donna
    Riegel, Barbara
    Spertus, John A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2012, 125 (15) : 1 - 2
  • [4] Use of intensive care at the end of life in the United States: An epidemiologic study
    Angus, DC
    Barnato, AE
    Linde-Zwirble, WT
    Weissfeld, LA
    Watson, RS
    Rickert, T
    Rubenfeld, GD
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (03) : 638 - 643
  • [5] Hope, Truth, and Preparing for Death: Perspectives of Surrogate Decision Makers
    Apatira, Latifat
    Boyd, Elizabeth A.
    Malvar, Grace
    Evans, Leah R.
    Luce, John M.
    Lo, Bernard
    White, Douglas B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 149 (12) : 861 - +
  • [6] Compassionate Silence in the Patient-Clinician Encounter: A Contemplative Approach
    Back, Anthony L.
    Bauer-Wu, Susan M.
    Rushton, Cynda H.
    Halifax, Joan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 12 (12) : 1113 - 1117
  • [7] Faculty Development to Change the Paradigm of Communication Skills Teaching in Oncology
    Back, Anthony L.
    Arnold, Robert M.
    Baile, Walter F.
    Tulsky, James A.
    Barley, Gwyn E.
    Pea, Roy D.
    Fryer-Edwards, Kelly A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (07) : 1137 - 1141
  • [8] Abandonment at the End of Life From Patient, Caregiver, Nurse, and Physician Perspectives
    Back, Anthony L.
    Young, Jessica P.
    McCown, Ellen
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    Vig, Elizabeth K.
    Reinke, Lynn F.
    Wenrich, Marjorie D.
    McGrath, Barbara B.
    Curtis, J. Randall
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 169 (05) : 474 - 479
  • [9] Baile WF, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P887, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<887::AID-CNCR27>3.3.CO
  • [10] 2-O