Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis Applied to African Easterly Waves

被引:46
作者
Torn, Ryan D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONVECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1175/2009WAF2222255.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
An ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) coupled to the Advanced Research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model is used to generate ensemble analyses and forecasts of a strong African easterly wave (AEW) during the African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis field campaign. Ensemble sensitivity analysis is then used to evaluate the impacts of initial condition errors on AEW amplitude and position forecasts at two different initialization times. WRF forecasts initialized at 0000 UTC 8 September 2006, prior to the amplification of the AEW, are characterized by large variability in evolution as compared to forecasts initialized 48 h later when the AEW is within a denser observation network. Short-lead-time amplitude forecasts are most sensitive to the midtropospheric meridional winds, while at longer lead times, midtropospheric theta(e) errors have equal or larger impacts. For AEW longitude forecasts, the largest sensitivities are associated with the theta(e) downstream of the AEW and, to a lesser extent, the meridional winds. Ensemble predictions of how initial condition errors impact the AEW amplitude and position compare qualitatively well with perturbed integrations of the WRF model. Much of the precipitation associated with the AEW is generated by the Kain-Fritsch cumulus parameterization, thus the initial-condition sensitivities are also computed for ensemble forecasts that employ the Betts-Miller-Janjic and Grell cumulus parameterization schemes, and for a high-resolution nested domain with explicit convection, but with the same initial conditions. While the 12-h AEW amplitude forecast is characterized by consistent initial-condition sensitivity among the different schemes, there is greater variability among methods beyond 24 h. In contrast, the AEW longitude forecast is sensitive to the downstream thermodynamic profile with all cumulus schemes.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 78
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
2
[32]   The propagation and diurnal cycles of deep convection in northern tropical Africa [J].
Laing, Arlene G. ;
Carbone, Richard ;
Levizzani, Vincenzo ;
Tuttle, John .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2008, 134 (630) :93-109
[33]  
PAYNE SW, 1977, MON WEATHER REV, V105, P413, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<0413:TROSIC>2.0.CO
[34]  
2
[35]   African monsoon multidisciplinary analysis - An international research project and field campaign [J].
Redelsperger, Jean-Luc ;
Thorncroft, Chris D. ;
Diedhiou, Arona ;
Lebel, Thierry ;
Parker, Douglas J. ;
Polcher, Jan .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2006, 87 (12) :1739-+
[36]  
REED RJ, 1977, MON WEATHER REV, V105, P317, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<0317:TSAPOA>2.0.CO
[37]  
2
[38]   A Probabilistic Analysis of the Dynamics and Predictability of Tropical Cyclogenesis [J].
Sippel, Jason A. ;
Zhang, Fuqing .
JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2008, 65 (11) :3440-3459
[39]  
Thorncroft C, 2007, CLIVAR EXCHANGES, V12, P18
[40]  
THORNCROFT CD, 1994, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V120, P953, DOI 10.1002/qj.49712051809