Physiologically based pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefuroxime in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis

被引:7
|
作者
Rimmler, Christer [1 ]
Lanckohr, Christian [2 ]
Akamp, Ceren [2 ]
Horn, Dagmar [3 ]
Fobker, Manfred [4 ]
Wiebe, Karsten [5 ]
Redwan, Bassam [5 ]
Ellger, Bjoern [6 ]
Koeck, Robin [7 ]
Hempel, Georg [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Pharmaceut & Med Chem Clin Pharm, Corrensstr 48, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care Med & Pain Therapy, Munster, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Pharm, Munster, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Muenster, Ctr Lab Med, Munster, Germany
[5] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Div Thorac Surg & Lung Transplantat, Munster, Germany
[6] Klinikum Westfalen, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care & Pain Med, Dortmund, Germany
[7] DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend, Inst Hyg, Berlin, Germany
关键词
pharmacokinetics; pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic < pharmacodynamics < pharmacodynamics; antibiotics < infectious diseases; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL; BETA-LACTAMS; DRUG-INTERACTIONS; PROTEIN-BINDING; CEFEPIME; PHARMACODYNAMICS; TRANSPORTERS; ELIMINATION; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.14121
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aims Adequate plasma concentrations of antibiotics during surgery are essential for the prevention of surgical site infections. We examined the pharmacokinetics of 1.5 g cefuroxime administered during induction of anaesthesia with follow-up doses every 2.5 hours until the end of surgery. We built a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model with the aim to ensure adequate antibiotic plasma concentrations in a heterogeneous population. Methods A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PK-Sim (R)/MoBi (R)) was developed to investigate unbound plasma concentrations of cefuroxime. Blood samples from 25 thoracic surgical patients were analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography. To evaluate optimized dosing regimens, physiologically based pharmacokinetic model simulations were conducted. Results Dosing simulations revealed that a standard dosing regimen of 1.5 g every 2.5 hours reached the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for Staphylococcus aureus. However, for Escherichia coli, >50% of the study participants did not reach predefined targets. Effectiveness of cefuroxime against E. coli can be improved by administering a 1.5 g bolus immediately followed by a continuous infusion of 3 g cefuroxime over 3 hours. Conclusion The use of cefuroxime for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent staphylococcal surgical site infections appears to be effective with standard dosing of 1.5 g preoperatively and follow-up doses every 2.5 hours. In contrast, if E. coli is relevant in surgeries, this dosing regimen appears insufficient. With our derived dose recommendations, we provide a solution for this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:2864 / 2877
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Population pharmacokinetic evaluation of cefuroxime in perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during and after cardiopulmonary bypass
    Rimmler, Christer
    Lanckohr, Christian
    Mittrup, Miriam
    Welp, Henryk
    Wuerthwein, Gudrun
    Horn, Dagmar
    Fobker, Manfred
    Ellger, Bjoern
    Hempel, Georg
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 87 (03) : 1486 - 1498
  • [2] PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS BY CEFUROXIME IN ACCIDENT SURGICAL AND ORTHOPEDIC INTERVENTIONS
    KETTERL, R
    WITTWER, W
    MEDIZINISCHE WELT, 1995, 46 (02): : 106 - 112
  • [3] PERIOPERATIVE ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS WITH CEFUROXIME IN ORAL MAXILLOFACIAL SURGICAL-PROCEDURES
    ALFTER, G
    SCHWENZER, N
    FRIESS, D
    MOHRLE, E
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLO-FACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 23 (01): : 38 - 41
  • [4] Evaluation of the Appropriate Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Italy
    Napolitano, Francesco
    Izzo, Maria Teresa
    Di Giuseppe, Gabriella
    Angelillo, Italo F.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [5] A PHYSIOLOGICALLY-BASED PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL FOR THE ANTIBIOTIC ERTAPENEM
    Joyner, Michele L.
    Manning, Cammey C.
    Forbes, Whitney
    Maiden, Michelle
    Nikas, Ariel N.
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (01) : 119 - 133
  • [6] Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
    Reutter, F.
    Reuter, D. A.
    Hilgarth, H.
    Heilek, A. M.
    Goepfert, M. S.
    Punke, M. A.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2014, 63 (01): : 73 - 84
  • [7] Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis
    Manekeller, Steffen
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2022, 147 (04): : 344 - 344
  • [8] Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis
    Mosquera Fernandez, Abian
    Souto Rey, Victoriano
    Vale Carrodeguas, Maria
    Garcia Castro, Ricardo
    REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE CIENCIAS PODOLOGICAS, 2013, 7 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [9] Perioperative Prophylaxis and Treatment for Infections Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis
    Tammer, Ina
    Geginat, Gernot
    Schlueter, Dirk
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2011, 46 (10): : 674 - 681
  • [10] Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis [Perioperative antibiotikaprophylaxe]
    Reutter F.
    Reuter D.A.
    Hilgarth H.
    Heilek A.M.
    Goepfert M.S.
    Punke M.A.
    Der Anaesthesist, 2014, 63 (1) : 73 - 86