Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial

被引:10
作者
Dadhwal, Vatsla [1 ]
Garimella, Sita [1 ]
Khoiwal, Kavita [1 ]
Sharma, K. Aparna [1 ]
Perumal, Vanamail [1 ]
Deka, Dipika [1 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, New Delhi, India
关键词
Misoprostol; ethacridine lactate; second trimester abortion; UTERINE RUPTURE; 2ND-TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; TERMINATION; UTERUS;
D O I
10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.18341
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare two medical methods for second-trimester abortion, mifepristone followed by misoprostol versus mifepristone followed by ethacridine lactate and oxytocin for success rate, induction to abortion time and acceptability. Materials and Methods: This is a randomized trial conducted from July 2014 to May 2016 and enrolled 120 women undergoing second trimester abortion (13-20 weeks). All patients received 200mg mifepristone orally and were randomized to receive further treatment after 36 hrs. Patients in Group M (n=60) received 400 microgram of misoprostol vaginally every 3 hours (maximum - 5 doses) and Group E (n .60) had extra amniotic ethacridine lactate instillation followed by oxytocin infusion (max- 100miu). Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Success rate was 100% in group M and 98.3% in group F (p=0.31). Mean induction to abortion time was significantly shorter in group M than group E (8.2+2.3hours & 10.9+2.6 hours respectively; p=0.001). Majority of women reported side effects, 96.7% women in group M and 75% women in group E (p=0.001). Fall in hemoglobin after procedure was significantly higher in group M (0.70+0.33gram %) than group E (052+0.23 gram %) (p=0.001). Perception of intensity of pain was significantly more in group M but patient satisfaction in both groups was similar. Conclusion: Both methods are comparable for success rate, induction interval was more for ethacridine lactate compared to misoprostol.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 266
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Obstet Gynecol, V121, P1394, DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000431056.79334.cc
  • [2] Ben-Meir A, 2009, J REPROD MED, V54, P511
  • [3] Intraamniotic ethacridine lactate instillation versus vaginal PGE1 in second trimester termination of pregnancy
    Berg, Christoph
    Ludwig, Michael
    Sturm, Nina
    Diedrich, Klaus
    Gembruch, Ulrich
    Geipel, Annegret
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 126 (02) : 193 - 196
  • [4] Uterine rupture during second-trimester abortion associated with misoprostol
    Berghahn, L
    Christensen, D
    Droste, S
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (05) : 976 - 977
  • [5] UTERINE RUPTURE DURING INDUCED MID-TRIMESTER ABORTION
    BIALE, Y
    LEWENTHAL, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1985, 19 (03) : 175 - 182
  • [6] Mifepristone combined with ethacridine lactate for the second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with placenta previa and/or prior cesarean deliveries
    Chen, Chunqin
    Lin, Feikai
    Wang, Xiaoyun
    Jiang, Yaping
    Wu, Sufang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (01) : 119 - 124
  • [7] Cuellar TM, 2011, OBSTET GYNECOL INT, DOI [10.1155/2011/584652, DOI 10.1155/2011/584652]
  • [8] Deliwala K, 2013, NAT J MED RES, V3, P16
  • [9] Egbe Thomas Obinchemti, 2016, BMC Res Notes, V9, P492
  • [10] Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Oxytocin for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Elami-Suzin, Matan
    Freeman, Martine D.
    Porat, Nurit
    Rojansky, Nathan
    Laufer, Neri
    Ben-Meir, Assaf
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04) : 815 - 820