Prospective study on incidence and functional impact of transient neurologic symptoms associated with 1% versus 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in short urologic procedures

被引:17
作者
Tong, D
Wong, J
Chung, F
Friedlander, M
Bremang, J
Mezei, G
Streiner, D
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] N York Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] St Josephs Hlth Ctr, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200302000-00030
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The objectives of this study were to compare the incidence, onset, duration and pain scores of transient neurologic symptoms (INS) with 1% versus 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in spinal anesthesia for short urological procedures in a large prospective study. This study would also evaluate patient satisfaction, and impact of TNS on functional recovery to assess the clinical significance of TNS. Methods: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Four hundred fifty-three patients undergoing short transurethral procedures were randomized to receive 1% or 5% hyperbaric lidocaine. Eighty milligrams of 1% or 5% hyperbaric lidocaine was administered. During the first 3 days after surgery, the presence of TNS, its intensity and duration, and patient functional level were recorded. An intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: There was no difference in the incidence of TNS (21% vs. 18%) between 1% versus 5% lidocaine. Patients with TNS had significantly higher pain scores (5.3 +/- 3 vs. 2.3 +/- 3) than patients without TNS during the first 24 h. This difference in pain scores persisted until 72 h postoperatively. There was a significant difference in the daily activities functional scores (2.2 +/- 1 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.8) of TNS versus non-TNS patients during the first 24 It postoperatively. Conclusions: There was no difference in the incidence of TNS between the 1% versus 5% spinal lidocaine groups. Pain scores were higher in patients with TNS than those who did not have TNS. During the first 48 It postop, a small proportion of patients who had TNS experienced functional impairment of walking, sitting, and sleeping.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 494
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[2]   CONCENTRATION-DEPENDENCE OF LIDOCAINE-INDUCED IRREVERSIBLE CONDUCTION LOSS IN FROG NERVE [J].
BAINTON, CR ;
STRICHARTZ, GR .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (03) :657-667
[3]   TRANSIENT NEUROLOGIC DEFICIT AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA - LOCAL-ANESTHETIC MALDISTRIBUTION WITH PENCIL POINT NEEDLES [J].
BEARDSLEY, D ;
HOLMAN, S ;
GANTT, R ;
ROBINSON, RA ;
LINDSEY, J ;
BAZARAL, M ;
STEWART, SFC ;
STEVENS, RA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :314-320
[4]  
CARPENTER RL, 1995, ANESTH ANALG, V81, P1125
[5]   RECOVERY PATTERN AND HOME-READINESS AFTER AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
CHUNG, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 80 (05) :896-902
[6]   NEUROTOXICITY OF LIDOCAINE - DOES IT EXIST [J].
DOUGLAS, MJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1995, 42 (03) :181-185
[7]   Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia: An epidemiologic study of 1,863 patients [J].
Freedman, JM ;
Li, DK ;
Drasner, K ;
Jaskela, MC ;
Larsen, B ;
Wi, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (03) :633-641
[8]   Transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia - A lower incidence with prilocaine and bupivacaine than with lidocaine [J].
Hampl, KF ;
Heinzmann-Wiedmer, S ;
Luginbuehl, I ;
Harms, C ;
Seeberger, M ;
Schneider, MC ;
Drasner, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 88 (03) :629-633
[9]   A similar incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 2% and 5% lidocaine [J].
Hampl, KF ;
Schneider, MC ;
Pargger, H ;
Gut, J ;
Drewe, J ;
Drasner, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (05) :1051-1054
[10]   Neurologic complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia [J].
Horlocker, TT ;
Wedel, DJ .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (01) :83-98