Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer

被引:0
作者
Baypaktar, S
Bayraktar, Z
机构
[1] Istanbul Surg Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Beyoglu Eye Educ & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
central corneal thickness; intraocular pressure; Goldmann applanation tonometer; pneumatonometer; optical coherence tomography; LASIK;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE. To investigate central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) relationship in eyes with and without previous corneal laser refractive surgery and to compare the estimates of two different tonometers-Goldmann applanation and pneumatonometer. METHODS. The study population included 234 glaucoma suspects who were referred to the glaucoma clinic with cup/disc ratios greater than 0.4, asymmetric cupping, and/or IOP greater than 22 mmHg during routine eye examination. Of those, 84 had previous myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (Group 1) while 150 of them did not (Group 2). CCT was measured by using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and IOP with both Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and pneumatonometer (PT). In both groups, the difference between IOP estimates of two different tonometers and the relationship between CCT and IOP were analyzed. RESULTS. In eyes with previous LASIK, GAT measured IOP significantly lower than PT (mean difference of 3.8 +/- 1.9 mmHg, p < 0.0001). In eyes with virgin corneas, IOP estimates of GAT or PT were not different from each other (19.9 +/- 2.8 versus 19.9 +/- 2.2 mmHg, respectively, p = 0.81). In both groups, there was a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP estimates of GAT (R = 0.29, p = 0.007 in eyes with LASIK and R = 0.38, p < 0.0001 in those without), while no similar relationship was present between CCT with those of PT (R = 0.03, p = 0.76 in eyes with LASIK and R = 0.03, p = 0.69 in those without). CONCLUSIONS. In eyes with previous LASIK, GAT measured IOP significantly lower than PT Because IOP estimates of PT were found to be independent from CCT in all of the study eyes, this device was considered to be a more reliable method of IOP estimation than GAT in eyes with and without previous LASIK.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 88
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the digital tonometer TGDc-01 'PRA' and the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Meyer, MW
    Gockeln, R
    Hoy, L
    Meyer, A
    Erb, C
    OPHTHALMIC RESEARCH, 2004, 36 (05) : 250 - 254
  • [22] Effect of mild to moderate myopic correction by laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis on intraocular pressure measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen, and pneumatonometer
    Vakili, R
    Choudhri, SA
    Tauber, S
    Shields, MB
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2002, 11 (06) : 493 - 496
  • [23] Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults
    Karmiris, Efthymios
    Tsiripidis, Konstantinos
    Gartaganis, Panos S.
    Totou, Styliani
    Vasilopoulou, Maria-Giannoula
    Patelis, Andreas
    Giannakis, Ioannis
    Chalkiadaki, Evangelia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (02) : 951 - 959
  • [24] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the tono-pen, goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact tonometer in nonglaucomatous pseudophakic children
    Yalcin, Sibel Oskan
    Kaplan, Aysin Tuba
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [25] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements and Assessment of Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility With the Portable ICare Rebound Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Glaucoma Patients
    Salim, Sarwat
    Du, Haiming
    Wan, Jim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (04) : 325 - 329
  • [26] The applicability of correction factor for corneal thickness on non-contact tonometer measured intraocular pressure in LASIK treated eyes
    Jethani, Jitendra
    Dave, Paaraj
    Jethani, Monica
    Desai, Yogesh
    Patel, Purvi
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [27] Red-free light for measurement of intraocular pressure using Goldmann applanation tonometer without fluorescein
    Ghoneim, Ehab M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 24 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [28] Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after corneal refractive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hui
    Sun, Zhengtao
    Li, Lin
    Sun, Ran
    Zhang, Haixia
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [29] The Difference in Intraocular Pressure Readings Between 3 Applanation Tonometers is Independent of Central Corneal Thickness, in Glaucomatous and Nonglaucomatous Eyes
    Baily, Caroline
    Dooley, Ian
    Collins, Niamh
    Hickey-Dwyer, Marie
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2014, 23 (09) : 620 - 623
  • [30] Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Icare PRO Rebound Tonometer, Tomey FT-1000 Noncontact Tonometer, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Healthy Subjects
    Guler, Mete
    Bilak, Semsettin
    Bilgin, Burak
    Simsek, Ali
    Capkin, Musa
    Reyhan, Ali Hakim
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (08) : 613 - 618