共 37 条
Depression, anxiety and self-care behaviours of young adults with Type 2 diabetes: results from the International Diabetes Management and Impact for Long-term Empowerment and Success (MILES) Study
被引:65
作者:
Browne, J. L.
[1
,2
]
Nefs, G.
[3
]
Pouwer, F.
[3
]
Speight, J.
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Diabet Australia Vic, Australian Ctr Behav Res Diabet, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Mental Hlth & Wellbeing Res, Sch Psychol, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Ctr Res Psychol Somat Dis CoRPS, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] AHP Res, Hornchurch, Essex, England
关键词:
SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS;
INSULIN THERAPY;
NATIONAL-SURVEY;
COMPLICATIONS;
MORTALITY;
MELLITUS;
RISK;
D O I:
10.1111/dme.12566
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
AimYoung adults with Type 2 diabetes have higher physical morbidity and mortality than other diabetes sub-groups, but differences in psychosocial outcomes have not yet been investigated. We sought to compare depression and anxiety symptoms and self-care behaviours of young adults with Type 2 diabetes with two matched control groups. MethodsUsing cross-sectional survey data from the Australian and Dutch Diabetes Management and Impact for Long-term Empowerment and Success (MILES) studies, we matched 93 young adults (aged 18-39 years) with Type 2 diabetes (case group) with: (i) 93 older adults (40 years) with Type 2 diabetes (Type 2 diabetes control group; matched on country, gender, education, diabetes duration and insulin use) and (ii) 93 young adults with Type 1 diabetes (Type 1 diabetes control group; matched on country, gender, age and education). Groups were compared with regard to depression symptoms (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire), anxiety symptoms (seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaire) and frequency of selected self-care behaviours (single item per behaviour). ResultsParticipants in the case group had higher depression scores (Cohen's d =0.40) and were more likely to have clinically meaningful depressive symptoms (Cramer's V=0.23) than those in the Type 2 diabetes control group. Participants in the case group had statistically equivalent depression scores to the Type 1 diabetes control group. The groups did not differ in anxiety scores. Those in the case group were less likely than both control groups to take insulin as recommended (Cramer's V =0.24-0.34), but there were no significant differences between the groups in oral medication-taking. The case group were less likely than the Type 2 diabetes control group to eat healthily (Cramer's V =0.16), and less likely than the Type 1 diabetes control group to be physically active (Cramer's V =0.15). ConclusionsOur results suggest that Type 2 diabetes is as challenging as Type 1 diabetes for young adults and more so than for older adults. Young adults with Type 2 diabetes may require more intensive psychological and self-care support than their older counterparts. What's new? Young adults with Type 2 diabetes have higher rates of physical morbidity and mortality than other diabetes subgroups, but differences in psychosocial outcomes have not yet been investigated. Using a case-control analysis, the present study is the first to compare emotional well-being and self-care outcomes of young adults with Type 2 diabetes with those of older adults with Type 2 diabetes and young adults with Type 1 diabetes. As the number of young adults with Type 2 diabetes rises, healthcare professionals must consider the ways in which information and services can be tailored for this group to provide optimum support.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文