A Physical Patch Model for GNSS-R Land Applications

被引:12
作者
Zhu, Jiyue [1 ]
Tsang, Leung [1 ]
Xu, Haokui [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Radiat Lab, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
MAXWELL EQUATIONS; SCATTERING;
D O I
10.2528/PIER19031003
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We consider the Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) for land applications. A distinct feature of land is that the topography has multiple elevations. The rms of elevations is in meters causing random phases between different elevations, which affect the coherent wave that has definite phase and the Fresnel zone effects as shown previously by a Kirchhoff numerical simulator (KA simulator). In this paper, we develop a physical patch model that is computationally efficient. The entire area within the footprint is divided into patches. Each patch is small enough to satisfy the plane wave incidence and is large enough to ignore mutual wave interactions between patches. The bistatic scattering cross section of each patch for the coherent and incoherent field is computed. The bistatic cross section of plane wave incidence is obtained from lookup tables (LUTs) of the numerical 3D solution of Maxwell equations (NMM3D). The SWC represents the summation of weighted coherent fields over patches. The SWICI represents the summation of weighted incoherent intensities over patches. The formula of the received power is the sum of powers from the SWC and SWICI (the SWC/SWICI formula). The weighting factor of each patch is based on the geometry, spherical waves, and the considerations of field amplitudes and phase variations. We also present an alternative formula, the "correlation" formula, using the summation of power from each physical area and correlations of SWCs from areas. The SWC/SWICI formula and the "correlation" formula are shown analytically to be the same. Results are compared with the KA simulator and two common models (the coherent model and the incoherent model). Results of the patch model are consistent with the KA simulator. For the simulation cases, the results fall between the coherent model and the incoherent model. The patch model is much more computationally efficient than the KA simulator and the results are more accurate. In examples of this paper, the patch model results are independent of patch size as long as the patch size smaller than 50 m and much larger than the wavelength of GNSS-R frequency.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 105
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Investigation of Potential of GNSS-R Polarization: Theoretical Simulations [J].
Wu, Xuerui ;
Du, Xiaoyong ;
Yan, Feng ;
Bai, Weihua ;
Song, Shaohui .
REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (15)
[22]   Forest biomass monitoring with GNSS-R: Theoretical simulations [J].
Ferrazzoli, P. ;
Guerriero, L. ;
Pierdicca, N. ;
Rahmoune, R. .
ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2011, 47 (10) :1823-1832
[23]   Classifying Inundation in a Tropical Wetlands Complex with GNSS-R [J].
Rodriguez-Alvarez, Nereida ;
Podest, Erika ;
Jensen, Katherine ;
McDonald, Kyle C. .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (09)
[24]   An Analysis of a Commercial GNSS-R Soil Moisture Dataset [J].
Al-Khaldi, Mohammad M. ;
Johnson, Joel T. ;
Horton, Dustin ;
McKague, Darren S. ;
Twigg, Dorina ;
Russel, Anthony ;
Policelli, Frederick S. ;
Ouellette, Jeffrey D. ;
Bindlish, Rajat ;
Park, Jeonghwan .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 17 :15480-15493
[25]   Calibration of the Polarimetric GNSS-R Sensor in the Rongowai Mission [J].
Bai, Dinan ;
Ruf, Christopher S. ;
Moller, Delwyn .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 63
[26]   Spatial Resolution in GNSS-R Under Coherent Scattering [J].
Camps, Adriano .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2020, 17 (01) :32-36
[27]   A study of the electromagnetic bias for GNSS-R ocean altimetry using the choppy wave model [J].
Park, Jeonghwan ;
Johnson, Joel T. ;
Lowe, Stephen T. .
WAVES IN RANDOM AND COMPLEX MEDIA, 2016, 26 (04) :599-612
[28]   First Evaluation of Topography on GNSS-R: An Empirical Study Based on a Digital Elevation Model [J].
Carreno-Luengo, Hugo ;
Luzi, Guido ;
Crosetto, Michele .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (21)
[29]   Determining Real Permittivity from Fresnel Coefficients in GNSS-R [J].
Savi, Patrizia ;
Bertoldo, Silvano ;
Milani, Albert .
PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH M, 2019, 79 :159-166
[30]   Is Accurate Synoptic Altimetry Achievable by Means of Interferometric GNSS-R? [J].
Fabra, Fran ;
Cardellach, Estel ;
Ribo, Serni ;
Li, Weiqiang ;
Rius, Antonio ;
Carlos Arco-Fernandez, Juan ;
Nogues-Correig, Oleguer ;
Praks, Jaan ;
Rouhe, Erkka ;
Seppanen, Jaakko ;
Martin-Neira, Manuel .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (05)