Whiplash Associated Disorders: Redefining whiplash and its management by the Quebec Task Force - A critical evaluation

被引:65
作者
Freeman, MD [1 ]
Croft, AC
Rossignol, AM
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Spine Res Inst San Diego, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
cervical sprain; epidemiology; Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders; whiplash;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199805010-00015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. The two publications of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders were evaluated by the authors of this report for methodologic error and bias. Objectives. To determine whether the conclusions and recommendations of the Ouebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders regarding the natural history and epidemiology of whiplash injuries are valid. Summary of the Background Data. In 1995, the Ouebec Task Force authored a text (published by the Societe de l'Assurance Automobile du Quebec) and a pullout supplement in Spine entitled "Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Redefining Whiplash and its Management." The Quebec Task Force concluded that whiplash injuries result in "temporary discomfort," are "usually self-limited," and have a "favorable prognosis," and that the "pain [resulting from whiplash injuries] is not harmful." Methods. The authors of the current report reviewed the text and the supplement for methodologic flaws that may have threatened the validity of the conclusions and recommendations of the Quebec Task Force. Results. Five distinct and significant categories of methodologic error were found. They were: selection bias, information bias, confusing and unconventional use of terminology, unsupported conclusions and recommendations, and inappropriate generalizations from the Ouebec Cohort Study. Conclusion. The validity of the conclusions and recommendations of the Ouebec Task Force regarding the natural course and epidemiology of whiplash injuries is questionable. This lack of validity stems from the presence of bias, the use of unconventional terminology, and conclusions that are not concurrent with the literature the Task Force accepted for review. Although the Task Force set out to redefine whiplash and its management, striving for the desirable goal of clarification of the numerous contentious issues surrounding the injury, its publications instead have confused the subject further.
引用
收藏
页码:1043 / 1049
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]  
NYGREN A, 1996, WHIPL 96 ABSTR, P34
[22]  
OLSSON I, 1990, P 1990 INT IRCOBI C, P1
[23]   ROLE OF PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS IN RECOVERY FROM COMMON WHIPLASH [J].
RADANOV, BP ;
DISTEFANO, G ;
SCHNIDRIG, A ;
BALLINARI, P .
LANCET, 1991, 338 (8769) :712-715
[24]   FACTORS INFLUENCING RECOVERY FROM HEADACHE AFTER COMMON WHIPLASH [J].
RADANOV, BP ;
STURZENEGGER, M ;
DISTEFANO, G ;
SCHNIDRIG, A ;
ALJINOVIC, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6905) :652-655
[25]   PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS, COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE AND DISABILITY AFTER COMMON WHIPLASH [J].
RADANOV, BP ;
DISTEFANO, G ;
SCHNIDRIG, A ;
STURZENEGGER, M .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1993, 37 (01) :1-10
[26]   LONG-TERM OUTCOME AFTER WHIPLASH INJURY - A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP CONSIDERING FEATURES OF INJURY MECHANISM AND SOMATIC, RADIOLOGIC, AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FINDINGS [J].
RADANOV, BP ;
STURZENEGGER, M ;
DISTEFANO, G .
MEDICINE, 1995, 74 (05) :281-297
[27]   COGNITIVE-FUNCTIONING AFTER COMMON WHIPLASH - A CONTROLLED FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
RADANOV, BP ;
DISTEFANO, G ;
SCHNIDRIG, A ;
STURZENEGGER, M ;
AUGUSTINY, KF .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1993, 50 (01) :87-91
[28]  
SCHRADER H, 1996, LANCET, V347, pS1201
[29]  
SPITZER WO, 1995, SPINE, V20, pS1
[30]  
SZABO TJ, 1992, 921573 SAE, P1