Current state of clinical end-points assessment in transplant: Key points

被引:14
作者
Hernandez, Domingo [1 ,2 ]
Muriel, Alfonso [3 ]
Abraira, Victor [3 ]
机构
[1] Carlos Haya Reg Univ Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Avda Carlos Haya S-N, E-29010 Malaga, Spain
[2] Univ Malaga, IBIMA, REDinREN RD12 0021 0015, Avda Carlos Haya S-N, Malaga 29010, Spain
[3] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Clin Biostat Unit, IRYCIS, CIBERESP, Crta Colmenar Km 9-1, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
关键词
RISK PREDICTION MODELS; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL-METHODS; PART I; CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS; SCIENTIFIC REGISTRY; DIABETES-MELLITUS; PATIENT SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.02.003
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Solid organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage organ disease. However, organ transplantation can stress the cardiovascular system and decrease immune surveillance, leading to early mortality and graft loss due to multiple underlying comorbidities. Clinical end-points in transplant include death and graft failure. Thus, generating accurate predictive models through regression models is crucial to test for definitive clinical post-transplantation end-points. Survival predictive models should assemble efficient surrogate markers or prognostic factors to generate a minimal set of variables derived from a proper modeling strategy through regression models. However, a few critical points should be considered when reporting survival analyses and regression models to achieve proper discrimination and calibration of the predictive models. Additionally, population-based risk scores may underestimate risk prediction in transplant. The application of predictive models in these patients should therefore incorporate both classical and non-classical risk factors, as well as community-based health indicators and transplant-specific factors to quantify the outcomes in terms of survival properly. This review focuses on assessment of clinical end-points in transplant through regression models by combining predictive and surrogate variables, and considering key points in these analyses to accurately predict definitive end-points, which could aid clinicians in decision making. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 99
页数:8
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Reporting quality of survival analyses in medical journals still needs improvement. A minimal requirements proposal [J].
Abraira, Victor ;
Muriel, Alfonso ;
Emparanza, Jose I. ;
Pijoan, Jose I. ;
Royuela, Ana ;
Nieves Plana, Maria ;
Cano, Alejandra ;
Urreta, Iratxe ;
Zamora, Javier .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) :1340-1346
[2]   STATISTICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONTRIBUTORS TO MEDICAL JOURNALS [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
GORE, SM ;
GARDNER, MJ ;
POCOCK, SJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 286 (6376) :1489-1493
[3]   Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model [J].
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Vergouwe, Yvonne ;
Royston, Patrick ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :1432-1435
[4]   Estimation of renal allograft half-life: fact or fiction? [J].
Antonieta Azancot, M. ;
Cantarell, Carme ;
Perello, Manel ;
Torres, Irina B. ;
Seron, Daniel .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 26 (09) :3013-3018
[5]   Contribution of impaired renal function to cardiovascular risk prediction models in renal transplant recipients [J].
Benguzzi, Mowad ;
Mansell, Holly ;
Hassan, Abubakar ;
Elmoselhi, Hamdi ;
Mainra, Rahul ;
Shoker, Ahmed .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (12) :1383-1392
[6]   Survival Analysis Part III: Multivariate data analysis - choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit [J].
Bradburn, MJ ;
Clark, TG ;
Love, SB ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (04) :605-611
[7]   Survival analysis part I: Basic concepts and first analyses [J].
Clark, TG ;
Bradburn, MJ ;
Love, SB ;
Altman, DG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (02) :232-238
[8]   OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Heart [J].
Colvin-Adams, M. ;
Smith, J. M. ;
Heubner, B. M. ;
Skeans, M. A. ;
Edwards, L. B. ;
Waller, C. D. ;
Callahan, E. R. ;
Snyder, J. J. ;
Israni, A. K. ;
Kasiske, B. L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15 :1-28
[9]   Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis .1. Background, goals, and general strategy [J].
Concato, J ;
Peduzzi, P ;
Holford, TR ;
Feinstein, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (12) :1495-1501
[10]   Delphi-Consensus Weights for Ischemic and Bleeding Events to Be Included in a Composite Outcome for RCTs in Thrombosis Prevention [J].
Dechartres, Agnes ;
Albaladejo, Pierre ;
Mantz, Jean ;
Samama, Charles Marc ;
Collet, Jean-Philippe ;
Steg, Philippe Gabriel ;
Ravaud, Philippe ;
Tubach, Florence .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (04)