Environmental flow assessment in Andean rivers of Ecuador, case study: Chanlud and El Labrado dams in the Machangara River

被引:15
作者
Alomia Herrera, Ilia [1 ,3 ]
Carrera Burneo, Patricia [2 ]
机构
[1] Escuela Politec Nacl, Fac Ingn Civil & Ambiental, Ladron de Guevara E11 253,POB 17-01-2759, Quito, Ecuador
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador, Av 12 Octubre 1076 & Roca,POB 17-01-21 84, Quito, Ecuador
[3] Univ Cent Ecuador, Fac Ingn Geol Minas Petr & Ambiental, Quito, Ecuador
关键词
MACROINVERTEBRATE; RESPONSES; STREAM; VARIABILITY; ASSEMBLAGES; RAINFALL; REGIMES; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecohyd.2017.01.002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The environmental flow is a management tool to mitigate the impact of a dam on ecosystems. The Ecuadorian law requires that the environmental flow remains 10% of mean annual flow in old hydroelectric stations, however advances on this area suggest this is not adequate. The objective of this research was to assess the impacts of a 10% release and establish environmental flow recommendations in the Machangara and Chulco rivers which have been dammed by the Chanlud and El Labrado hydroelectric plants, in the watershed of the Machangara River (southern Ecuador). During twelve months physical and chemical parameters, and aquatic macro-invertebrates were recorded. The analysis found significant differences in some parameters, indicating a decline in ecosystem condition and relations were found between the flow, the diversity of macro-invertebrates and the concentration of dissolved 02 (DO). However, determining whether these impacts are unacceptable is difficult because Ecuador does not have established criteria for required ecological condition. This deterioration in ecological conditions can be minimized by applying more modern methods of environmental flow assessment such as the basic flow methodology (BFM) that allows the variability of the river flow. In the Machangara River (3000-4000 m a.s.l.) an environmental flow of 27-51% of the mean annual flow for the rainy season and 29-42% in the dry season were determined by using BFM. Whereas for the Chulco River (3000-4000 m a.s.l.) the environmental flow was 15-45% of the mean annual flow for the rainy season and 15-36% for the dry season. (C) 2017 European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 112
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Agenda de Regulacion y Control de Electricidad, 2016, BAL NAC EN EL AG REG
[2]  
Alomia L, 2014, APLICACION METODOLOG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1976, FISHERIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ENV FLOWS SAVING RIV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN
[6]  
Baron JS, 2002, ECOL APPL, V12, P1247
[7]  
Bemis J. M. F. I., 2009, CAUDAL MINIMO MEDIOA
[8]  
Boodoo Kyle S., 2014, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, V14, P267, DOI 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2014.07.001
[9]   THE ECOLOGY OF 2 INTERMITTENT STREAMS IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA .3. TEMPORAL CHANGES IN FAUNAL COMPOSITION [J].
BOULTON, AJ ;
LAKE, PS .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (01) :123-138
[10]   Parallels and contrasts in the effects of drought on stream macroinvertebrate assemblages [J].
Boulton, AJ .
FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (07) :1173-1185