Methods of Colostomy Construction: No Effect on Parastomal Hernia Rate Results from Stoma-const-A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引：27

作者：

Correa Marinez, Adiela ^{[1
,2
]}

Bock, David ^{[1
]}

Erestam, Sofia ^{[1
]}

Engstrom, Anette ^{[1
,2
]}

Kalebo, Peter ^{[4
]}

Nielsen, Yousef Wirenfeldt ^{[5
]}

Rosenberg, Jacob ^{[3
]}

Haglind, Eva ^{[1
,2
]}

Angenete, Eva ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Surg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad,Scandinavian Surg Outcomes Res G, Gothenburg, Sweden

[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Gothenburg, Sweden

[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Surg, Herlev & Gentofte Hosp, Herlev Ringvej, Herlev, Denmark

[4] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden

[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Radiol, Herlev & Gentofte Hosp, Herlev Ringvej, Herlev, Denmark

来源：

ANNALS OF SURGERY | 2021年 / 273卷 / 04期

基金：

瑞典研究理事会;

关键词：

parastomal hernia; randomized controlled trial; stoma; surgical technique; PROPHYLACTIC MESH; PROSTHETIC MESH; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION; CLASSIFICATION; REINFORCEMENT; METAANALYSIS; PLACEMENT; EVOLUTION;

D O I：

10.1097/SLA.0000000000003843

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objective: The primary objective of this trial was to compare the parastomal hernia rates 1 year after the construction of an end colostomy by 3 surgical techniques: cruciate incision, circular incision in the fascia and using prophylactic mesh. Secondary objectives were evaluation of postoperative complications, readmissions/reoperations, and risk factors for parastomal hernia. Summary of Background Data: Colostomy construction techniques have been explored with the aim to improve function and reduce stoma complications, but parastomal herniation is frequent with an incidence of approximately 50%. Methods: A randomized, multicenter trial was performed in 3 hospitals in Sweden and Denmark; all patients scheduled to receive an end colostomy were asked to participate. Parastomal hernia within 12 months was determined by computed tomography of the abdomen in prone position and by clinical assessment. Complications, readmissions, reoperations, and risk factors were also assessed. Results: Two hundred nine patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 arms of the study. Patient demographics were similar in all 3 groups. Assessment of parastomal hernia was possible in 185 patients. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) for parastomal hernia was 1.25 (0.83; 1.88), and 1.22 (0.81; 1.84) between cruciate versus circular and cruciate versus mesh groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with regard to parastomal hernia rate. Age and body mass index were found to be associated with development of a parastomal hernia. Conclusion: We found no significant differences in the rates of parastomal hernia within 12 months of index surgery between the 3 surgical techniques of colostomy construction.

引用

页码：640 / 647

页数：8

共 51 条

[1] European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Antoniou, S. A.;Agresta, F.;Alamino, J. M. Garcia;Berger, D.;Berrevoet, F.;Brandsma, H-T;Bury, K.;Conze, J.;Cuccurullo, D.;Dietz, U. A.;Fortelny, R. H.;Frei-Lanter, C.;Hansson, B.;Helgstrand, F.;Hotouras, A.;Janes, A.;Kroese, L. F.;Lambrecht, J. R.;Kyle-Leinhase, I.;Lopez-Cano, M.;Maggiori, L.;Mandala, V.;Miserez, M.;Montgomery, A.;Morales-Conde, S.;Prudhomme, M.;Rautio, T.;Smart, N.;Smietanski, M.;Szczepkowski, M.;Stabilini, C.;Muysoms, F. E. HERNIA, 2018(01)
[2] Arumugam P J, 2003, Colorectal Dis, V5, P49, DOI 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00403.x
[3] Prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia: further questions need answering[J]. Blake, P. A.;Williams, G. L.;Stephenson, B. M. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017(06)
[4] Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Formation of an End-colostomy Reduces the Rate of Parastomal Hernia Short-term Results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial[J]. Brandsma, Henk-Thijs;Hansson, Birgitta M. E.;Aufenacker, Theo J.;van Geldere, Dick;Lammeren, Felix M. V.;Mahabier, Chander;Makai, Peter;Steenvoorde, Pascal;Reilingh, Tammo S. de Vries;Wiezer, Marinus J.;de Wilt, Johannes H. W.;Bleichrodt, Robert P.;Rosman, Camiel. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2017(04)
[5] Parastomal hernia[J]. Carne, PWG;Robertson, GM;Frizelle, FA. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003(07)
[6] The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications Five-Year Experience[J]. Clavien, Pierre A.;Barkun, Jeffrey;de Oliveira, Michelle L.;Vauthey, Jean Nicolas;Dindo, Daniel;Schulick, Richard D.;de Santibanes, Eduardo;Pekolj, Juan;Slankamenac, Ksenija;Bassi, Claudio;Graf, Rolf;Vonlanthen, Rene;Padbury, Robert;Cameron, John L.;Makuuchi, Masatoshi. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2009(02)
[7] Prophylactic mesh use during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia[J]. Cornille, J. B.;Pathak, S.;Daniels, I. R.;Smart, N. J. ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2017(01)
[8] Waist Circumference is an Independent Risk Factor for the Development of Parastomal Hernia After Permanent Colostomy[J]. De Raet, Jan;Delvaux, Georges;Haentjens, Patrick;Van Nieuwenhove, Yves. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2008(12)
[9] The origins and evolution of colostomy[J]. Dinnick, T. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1934(85)
[10] Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant[J]. Dmitrienko, A;Offen, WW;Westfall, PH. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2003(15)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →