The law of genetic privacy: applications, implications, and limitations

被引:126
作者
Clayton, Ellen Wright [1 ]
Evans, Barbara J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hazel, James W. [5 ]
Rothstein, Mark A. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Biomed Eth & Soc, Pediat, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Univ Houston, Law, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[3] Univ Houston, Elect & Comp Engn, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[4] Univ Houston, Ctr Biotechnol & Law, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Ctr Genet Privacy & Ident Community Settings, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[6] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Law & Med, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[7] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Inst Bioeth Hlth Policy & Law, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
DNA; genetics; genomics; GINA; HIPAA; privacy; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; DNA IDENTIFICATION; CLINICAL EXOME; GENOMIC DATA; HEALTH; DISCRIMINATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; INFORMATION; INSURANCE;
D O I
10.1093/jlb/lsz007
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent advances in technology have significantly improved the accuracy of genetic testing and analysis, and substantially reduced its cost, resulting in a dramatic increase in the amount of genetic information generated, analysed, shared, and stored by diverse individuals and entities. Given the diversity of actors and their interests, coupled with the wide variety of ways genetic data are held, it has been difficult to develop broadly applicable legal principles for genetic privacy. This article examines the current landscape of genetic privacy to identify the roles that the law does or should play, with a focus on federal statutes and regulations, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). After considering the many contexts in which issues of genetic privacy arise, the article concludes that few, if any, applicable legal doctrines or enactments provide adequate protection or meaningful control to individuals over disclosures that may affect them. The article describes why it may be time to shift attention from attempting to control access to genetic information to considering the more challenging question of how these data can be used and under what conditions, explicitly addressing trade-offs between individual and social goods in numerous applications.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 36
页数:36
相关论文
共 193 条
[101]  
Marchant Gary E., 2006, JL POLY, V14, P9
[102]  
Moreno Palmira Granados, 2017, J L BIOSCI
[103]  
Murray T.H., 1997, Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era
[104]  
National Research Council, 2007, APPL TOX TECHN PRED
[105]  
Niedwiecki A S, 2000, Univ San Francisco Law Rev, V34, P295
[106]  
Niedwiecki Anthony S., 2000, US FLA L REV, V34, P296
[107]  
NIH-DOE WORKING GROUP, 1993, ETH LEG SOC IMPL HUM
[108]  
NIHPrecisionMedicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group Report to the Advisory Committee to the Director, 2015, PREC MED IN COH BUIL
[109]  
NIMMER RAYMOND T., 2001, LAW COMPUTER TECHNOL, P16
[110]  
OMara Margaret, 2018, NY TIMES, pA31