Comparison of support vector machine, random forest and neural network classifiers for tree species classification on airborne hyperspectral APEX images

被引:246
作者
Raczko, Edwin [1 ]
Zagajewski, Bogdan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Geog & Reg Studies, Dept Geoinformat Cartog & Remote Sensing, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Support vector machines; random forest; artificial neural networks; hyperspectral data; classification; LIDAR DATA; VEGETATION; DISCRIMINATION; MAP;
D O I
10.1080/22797254.2017.1299557
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Knowledge of tree species composition in a forest is an important topic in forest management. Accurate tree species maps allow for much more detailed and in-depth analysis of biophysical forest variables. The paper presents a comparison of three classification algorithms: support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF) and artificial neural networks (ANN) for tree species classification using airborne hyperspectral data from the Airborne Prism EXperiment sensor. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the three nonparametric classification algorithms (SVM, RF and ANN) in an attempt to classify the five most common tree species of the Szklarska Poreba area: spruce (Picea alba L. Karst), larch (Larix decidua Mill.), alder (Alnus Mill), beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and birch (Betula pendula Roth). To avoid human introduced biases a 0.632 bootstrap procedure was used during evaluation of each compared classifier. Of all compared classification results, ANN achieved the highest median overall classification accuracy (77%) followed by SVM with 68% and RF with 62%. Analysis of the stability of results concluded that RF and SVM had the lowest variance of overall accuracy and kappa coefficient (12 percentage points) while ANN had 15 percentage points variance in results.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Estimating standing biomass in papyrus (Cyperus papyrus L.) swamp: exploratory of in situ hyperspectral indices and random forest regression [J].
Adam, Elhadi ;
Mutanga, Onisimo ;
Abdel-Rahman, Elfatih M. ;
Ismail, Riyad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 35 (02) :693-714
[2]   Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Biomass and Soil Moisture Retrievals from Remote Sensing Data [J].
Ali, Iftikhar ;
Greifeneder, Felix ;
Stamenkovic, Jelena ;
Neumann, Maxim ;
Notarnicola, Claudia .
REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (12) :16398-16421
[3]  
[Anonymous], ADAPTIVE LEARNING SY
[4]  
Beluco Adriano, 2015, International Journal of Energy and Environment (IJEE), V6, P437
[5]   Deterioration of forests in the Sudety Mountains, Poland, detected on satellite images [J].
Bochenek, Z ;
Ciolkosz, A ;
Iracka, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1997, 98 (03) :375-379
[6]   Is cross-validation valid for small-sample microarray classification? [J].
Braga-Neto, UM ;
Dougherty, ER .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (03) :374-380
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]  
Breiman L., 2004, Random Forests
[9]   Classification of Herbaceous Vegetation Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery [J].
Burai, Peter ;
Deak, Balazs ;
Valko, Orsolya ;
Tomor, Tamas .
REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (02) :2046-2066
[10]   Tree Species Classification in Boreal Forests With Hyperspectral Data [J].
Dalponte, Michele ;
Orka, Hans Ole ;
Gobakken, Terje ;
Gianelle, Damiano ;
Naesset, Erik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (05) :2632-2645