Effect of water stress on ten forage grasses native or introduced to Iran

被引:48
|
作者
Bahrani, Mohammad Jafar [1 ]
Bahrami, Hossein [1 ]
Haghighi, Ali Akbar Kamgar [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Shiraz 7144165186, Iran
关键词
Dry matter production index; leaf area; leaf water potential; water consumption; water-use efficiency; TALL FESCUE; DROUGHT STRESS; USE EFFICIENCY; RESPONSES; GROWTH; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; ROOT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-697X.2009.00165.x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Water stress is one of the most limiting factors in crop and forage production in semi-arid and arid regions. In a greenhouse experiment, ten forage grass species native or introduced to Iran were tested under imposed water stress. The experiment followed a 10 (species) x 3 (soil moisture) factorial design in four randomized blocks. The grass species were desert wheatgrass (Agropyron desertorum [Fisch] Schult.), tall wheatgrass (A. elongatum Host Beavu.), smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.), June wildrye (Elymus junceus Fisch.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium prenne L.), blue panicum (Panicum antidotale Retz.), large canarygrass (Phalaris tuberosa L.) and mountain wildrye (Secale montaneum Guss.). These species were grown in pots at three levels of moisture (23% [control], 17% [moderate] and 14% [severe] on the dry soil weight basis). Increased water stress decreased total water use in all grass species and tended to decrease plant height, leaf water potential, leaf area, water-use efficiency and root dry weight in all or most species, with varying degrees of reduction among the species. On the contrary, water stress generally had no effects on the root : shoot ratio of the grasses. Based on the reduction in total dry matter production under the two stress levels, tall wheatgrass and smooth bromegrass were the most drought-tolerant species, while orchardgrass was the most susceptible species.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF GLYPHOSATE ON INTRODUCED AND NATIVE GRASSES
    LYM, RG
    KIRBY, DR
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 5 (02) : 421 - 425
  • [2] Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses
    Bakker, J
    Wilson, S
    PLANT ECOLOGY, 2001, 157 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [3] Competitive abilities of introduced and native grasses
    Jonathan Bakker
    Scott Wilson
    Plant Ecology, 2001, 157 : 119 - 127
  • [5] WATER RELATIONS OF NATIVE AND INTRODUCED C-4 GRASSES IN A NEOTROPICAL SAVANNA
    BARUCH, Z
    FERNANDEZ, DS
    OECOLOGIA, 1993, 96 (02) : 179 - 185
  • [6] Evaluation of native and introduced grasses for reclamation and production
    Willms, WD
    Ellert, BH
    Janzen, HH
    Douwes, H
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2005, 58 (02) : 177 - 183
  • [7] FORAGE YIELD AND QUALITY OF INDIGENOUS AND INTRODUCED GRASSES AT PALMER, ALASKA
    MITCHELL, WW
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (05) : 899 - 905
  • [8] Merits of native and introduced Triticeae grasses on semiarid rangelands
    Asay, KH
    Horton, WH
    Jensen, KB
    Palazzo, AJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2001, 81 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [9] Evaluation of ten perennial forage grasses for biomass and nutritional quality
    Faji, Mulisa
    Kebede, Gezahagn
    Feyissa, Fekede
    Mohammed, Kedir
    Minta, Muluneh
    Mengistu, Solomon
    Tsegahun, Aschelew
    TROPICAL GRASSLANDS-FORRAJES TROPICALES, 2021, 9 (03): : 292 - 299
  • [10] Selected Indices to Identify Water-Stress-Tolerant Tropical Forage Grasses
    Zuffo, Alan Mario
    Steiner, Fabio
    Aguilera, Jorge Gonzalez
    Ratke, Rafael Felippe
    Barrozo, Leandra Matos
    Mezzomo, Ricardo
    dos Santos, Adaniel Sousa
    Soto Gonzales, Hebert Hernan
    Arias Cubillas, Pedro
    Mendez Ancca, Sheda
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (18):