Deconstruction of Oikeiosis: Filiation, Family and Familiarity in Gilles Deleuze and Jacques Derrida

This essay aims to prove the thesis that, towards the differences between Deleuze and Derrida, there is a common critic against the classical topic of "familiarity" (oikeiosis). A thinking against the filiation between individual, social, familiar, and national therms that involves in them, this philosophical question affects from the biological to the social and political aspects. Respect the biological, because the filiation is between the individual being and the specie; the social, because the filiation is the constitution of " the family" (the so called basis of all society). Finally, because the filiation is the general question of relationship and kinship. The critic, anyway, is different in the procedure: Deleuze go quickly to vanish the logic of filiation, and on the contrary, Derrida is slower and pacient in showing that the logic of familiarity is autoimmune and deconstructive of itself.