Children and young people's contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: A scoping review

被引:50
作者
Rouncefield-Swales, Alison [1 ]
Harris, Jane [2 ]
Carter, Bernie [1 ]
Bray, Lucy [1 ]
Bewley, Toni [1 ]
Martin, Rachael [1 ]
机构
[1] Edge Hill Univ, Fac Hlth Social Care & Med, Ormskirk, England
[2] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Publ Hlth Inst, Fac Hlth, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
SOCIAL CARE RESEARCH; PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; INTERVENTION; DESIGN; IMPACT; PARTICIPATION; ADOLESCENTS; PRIORITIES; PARENTS; YOUTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0252774
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background There has been an increasing interest in how children and young people can be involved in patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health research. However, relatively little robust evidence exists about which children and young people are reported as being involved or excluded from PPIE; the methods reported as being used to involve them in PPIE; and the reasons presented for their involvement in PPIE and what happens as a result. We performed a scoping review to identify, synthesise and present what is known from the literature about patient and public involvement and engagement activities with children and young people in health related research. Methods Relevant studies were identified by searches in Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane and PsychInfo databases, and hand checking of reference lists and grey literature. An adapted version of the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public (GRIPP2) was used as a framework to collate the data. Two reviewers independently screened articles and decisions were consensually made. Main findings A total of 9805 references were identified (after duplicates were removed) through the literature search, of which 233 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Forty studies published between 2000 and 2019 were included in the review. The review reveals ambiguities in the quality of reporting of PPIE with children with clear reporting on demographics and health conditions. The review found that children and young people were commonly involved in multiple stages of research but there was also significant variation in the level at which children and young people were involved in PPIE. Evaluation of the impact of children and young people's involvement in PPIE was limited. Conclusions Consultation, engagement and participation can all offer children and young people worthwhile ways of contributing to research with the level, purpose and impact of involvement determined by the children and young people themselves. However, careful decisions need to be made to ensure that it is suited to the context, setting and focus so that the desired PPIE impacts are achieved. Improvements should be made to the evaluation and reporting of PPIE in research. This will help researchers and funders to better understand the benefits, challenges and impact of PPIE with children and young people on health research.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Aldcroft A, PATIENT PARTNERSHIP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, INVOLVING CHILDREN Y
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The PIRICOM study: A systematic review of the conceptualisation, measurement, impact and outcomes of patients and public involvement in health and social care research
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, What is public involvement in research?
[5]  
Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[6]   Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review [J].
Bailey, S. ;
Boddy, K. ;
Briscoe, S. ;
Morris, C. .
CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 41 (04) :505-514
[7]   Evaluation of a Teen Dating Violence Prevention Intervention among Urban Middle-School Youth Using Youth Participatory Action Research: Lessons Learned from Start Strong Boston [J].
Beatriz, Elizabeth D. ;
Lincoln, Alisa K. ;
Alder, Jess ;
Daley, Nicole ;
Simmons, Felicia ;
Ibeh, Karibe ;
Figueroa, Crystal ;
Molnar, Beth E. .
JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2018, 33 (08) :563-578
[8]   Taking patient involvement seriously: a critical ethical analysis of participatory approaches in data-intensive medical research [J].
Beier, Katharina ;
Schweda, Mark ;
Schicktanz, Silke .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (1)
[9]   Network methods to support user involvement in qualitative data analyses: an introduction to Participatory Theme Elicitation [J].
Best, Paul ;
Badham, Jennifer ;
Corepal, Rekesh ;
O'Neill, Roisin F. ;
Tully, Mark A. ;
Kee, Frank ;
Hunter, Ruth F. .
TRIALS, 2017, 18
[10]   Voices not heard: A systematic review of adolescents' and emerging adults' perspectives of health care transition [J].
Betz, Cecily L. ;
Lobo, Marie L. ;
Nehring, Wendy M. ;
Bui, Kim .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2013, 61 (05) :311-336