National threatened species listing based on IUCN criteria and regional guidelines:: Current status and future perspectives

被引:137
作者
Miller, Rebecca M.
Rodriguez, Jon Paul
Aniskowicz-Fowler, Theresa
Bambaradeniya, Channa
Boles, Ruben
Eaton, Mark A.
Gardenfors, Ulf
Keller, Verena
Molur, Sanjay
Walker, Sally
Pollock, Caroline
机构
[1] Inst Venezolano Invest Cient, Ctr Ecol, Caracas 1041A, Venezuela
[2] Provita, Caracas 1041A, Venezuela
[3] Environm Canada, Canadian Wildlife Serv, Species Risk Branch, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada
[4] IUCN, World Conservat Union, Sri Lanka Country Off, Colombo 07, Sri Lanka
[5] Canadian Wildlife Serv, COSEWIC Secretariat, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3, Canada
[6] Royal Soc Protect Birds, Sandy SG19 2DL, Beds, England
[7] ArtDatabanken, Swedish Species Informat Ctr, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[8] Swiss Ornithol Inst, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland
[9] Zoo Outreach Org, Coimbatore 641004, Tamil Nadu, India
[10] IUCN, SSC Red List Programme, Cambridge CB3 0DL, England
关键词
assessment criteria; conservation priorities; endangered species; extinction; red lists; risk assessment; World Conservation Union (IUCN);
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00656.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
As countries worldwide become increasingly interested in conserving biodiversity, the profile of national threatened species lists expands and these lists become more influential in determining conservation priorities. The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Categories and Criteria for evaluating extinction risk, originally intended for use at the global level, are increasingly being used at the national level. To facilitate this process, the IUCN recently published guidelines for the application of the criteria at subglobal levels. We evaluated the application of these guidelines, focusing on the opinions and experience of the global community of national assessors. To assess the extent to which IUCN criteria have been used in official national listing efforts, we sent a survey to 180 Convention on Biological Diversity national focal points designated by governments. Of the respondents, 77% had developed national threatened species lists. Of these, 78% applied a version of the IUCN criteria, and 88% plan to produce future threatened species lists. The majority of this last group (83%) will use IUCN criteria. Of the countries that have or will develop a threatened species list, 82% incorporated their list or the IUCN criteria into national conservation strategies. We further explored the issues highlighted by the survey results by integrating the experience of assessors that have produced national lists. Most of the problems national assessors faced when applying the IUCN criteria arose when the criteria were applied at the regional level without the IUCN Regional Guidelines and when assessors were confused about the purpose of the IUCN criteria and lacked training in their proper use. To improve their clarity and increase their repeatability, we recommend that the IUCN increase communication and information exchange among countries and between regional and global assessors, potentially through an interactive Web site, to facilitate the development of national red lists and to improve their conservation value within and between countries.
引用
收藏
页码:684 / 696
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]  
MILLER R, 2005, NATL RED LIST ADVISO
[32]   Extinction risk and conservation priorities [J].
Miller, Rebecca M. ;
Rodriguez, Jon Paul ;
Aniskowicz-Fowler, Theresa ;
Bambaradeniya, Channa ;
Boles, Ruben ;
Eaton, Mark A. ;
Gardenfors, Ulf ;
Keller, Verena ;
Molur, Sanjay ;
Walker, Sally ;
Pollock, Caroline .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5786) :441-441
[33]   Application of IUCN red listing criteria at the regional and national levels:: A case study from central Asia [J].
Milner-Gulland, E. J. ;
Kreuzberg-Mukhina, E. ;
Grebot, B. ;
Ling, S. ;
Bykova, E. ;
Abdusalamov, I. ;
Bekenov, A. ;
Gardenfors, U. ;
Hilton-Taylor, C. ;
Salnikov, V. ;
Stogova, L. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2006, 15 (06) :1873-1886
[34]  
Molur S, 1998, Hamadryad, V23, P169
[35]   What are the best correlates of predicted extinction risk? [J].
O'Grady, JJ ;
Reed, DH ;
Brook, BW ;
Frankham, R .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 118 (04) :513-520
[36]   The application to the British flora of the World Conservation Union's revised Red List criteria and the significance of Red Lists for species conservation [J].
Palmer, MA ;
Hodgetts, NG ;
Wigginton, MJ ;
Ing, B ;
Stewart, NF .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 82 (02) :219-226
[37]   Conservation categories of siluroid fishes in North-East Sundarbans, India [J].
Patra, MK ;
Acharjee, SK ;
Chakraborty, SK .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2005, 14 (08) :1863-1876
[38]   Comment on "Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide" [J].
Pimenta, BVS ;
Haddad, CFB ;
Nascimento, LB ;
Cruz, CAG ;
Pombal, JP .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5743)
[39]   Environment -: Can we defy nature's end? [J].
Pimm, SL ;
Ayres, M ;
Balmford, A ;
Branch, G ;
Brandon, K ;
Brooks, T ;
Bustamante, R ;
Costanza, R ;
Cowling, R ;
Curran, LM ;
Dobson, A ;
Farber, S ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Gascon, C ;
Kitching, R ;
McNeely, J ;
Lovejoy, T ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Myers, N ;
Patz, JA ;
Raffle, B ;
Rapport, D ;
Raven, P ;
Roberts, C ;
Rodríguez, JP ;
Rylands, AB ;
Tucker, C ;
Safina, C ;
Samper, C ;
Stiassny, MLJ ;
Supriatna, J ;
Hall, DH ;
Wilcove, D .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5538) :2207-2208
[40]   Application to the terrestrial vertebrates of Italy of a system proposed by IUCN for a new classification of national Red List categories [J].
Pinchera, F ;
Boitani, L ;
Corsi, F .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1997, 6 (07) :959-978