Dynamic risk analysis for Seveso sites

被引:31
作者
Paltrinieri, Nicola [1 ]
Reniers, Genserik [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Prod & Qual Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ Antwerp, Operat Res Grp ANT OR, Fac Appl Econ, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] KULeuven, HUB, Ctr Corp Sustainabil CEDON, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Safety Sci Grp, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Dynamic risk analysis; Seveso site; Hazardous substances; DyPASI; Risk Barometer; Thermal risk index; ATYPICAL ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; PROCESS SYSTEMS; BOW-TIE; IDENTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT; PREVENTION; INDUSTRY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2017.03.023
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The accident that occurred in Seveso in 1976 changed our approach to risk assessment forever. For instance, it led to drafting specific European directives to prevent major accident hazards. Their focus is on industrial sites handling dangerous substances and denominated "Seveso sites". Their operators have the obligation to provide specific information to the competent authorities, such as safety reports. However, risk analysis studies usually provide a static picture of the site status, while the system constantly evolves or degrades. For this reason, this contribution suggests a dynamic risk analysis approach aiming to continuously calibrate and improve, based on new related evidence and lessons learned. The work suggests focusing on such early deviations to lower the probability of high impact low probability (HILP) events. Three complementary methods may be used to process such information: dynamic hazard identification, dynamic analysis of initiating events, and dynamic analysis of consequences. A representative example of their potential is provided by comparing their capabilities with the causes that led to the Seveso catastrophe. Despite its limitations, Dynamic Risk Analysis represents an opportunity for improved decision-making support and critical risk communication. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 119
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
Alberto R, 2015, WORKSHOP P DIRETTIVA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The Black Swan
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EC ANAL PETROLEUM CH, DOI DOI 10.16301/J.CNKI.CN12-1204
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, F27045 SINTEF
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NORSOK Standard Z- 013
[6]   A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Krohn, Bodil S. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 121 :1-10
[7]  
Casson Moreno V., 2016, Dynamic Risk Analysis in the Chemical and Petroleum Industry, P127, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-803765-2.00011-1, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-803765-2.00011-1]
[8]  
CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety), 2000, GUID CHEM PROC QUANT
[9]  
COMAH Competent Authorities, 2013, SIT PRIOR METH
[10]  
COMAH Competent Authorities, 2012, PROC SAF PERF IND OP